Patching extra functionality into <gamemd.exe>

[TheMan]

very nice work CnCVK, where will the code be placed? and does it allow to fire other aircraft types?

[Vinifera7]

He already answered that.. It's placed on aircraft types and allows them to target JUMPJET units.

[BaRaKa_]

This will be an RP 1.08b feature, or needs more work and will be availabile only for 1.09 ?

[VK]

This will be an RP 1.08b feature, or needs more work and will be availabile only for 1.09 ?

Officaly in 1.09 by you can test it in 1.08b

to target JUMPJET units.

ANY UNITS in air

and does it allow to fire other aircraft types?

Yes. But it's not fully Air-To-Air combat.

[Vinifera7]

ANY UNITS in air

Ah cool. Though most aircraft move quickly, so they would be hard to click on..

[Renegade]

DefaultToGuardArea=yes

[ZombyDragon]

I may be wrong and dont have time to check, but I dont think aircraft can use that.

[~Guest~]

ctrl+Shift XP

[Vinifera7]

I may be wrong and dont have time to check, but I dont think aircraft can use that.

I have tested this. Aircraft cannot use it.

Attack Move might actually be an option, but you'd have to remove PreventAttackMove=yes and CanPassiveAquire=no.

[Renegade]

Then use spawned airplanes from a building...
It's not like there aren't enough possibilities...

[Vinifera7]

Then use spawned airplanes from a building...
It's not like there aren't enough possibilities...

Exactly

[VK]

Ah cool. Though most aircraft move quickly, so they would be hard to click on..

Yes, it's problem.

DefaultToGuardArea=yes

I write:

It's ONLY allowing aircraft set target to air units

It NOT means what it can automatic attack


About colors:

Code:

db 3
db 11
db 21
db 29
db 13
db 25
db 17
db 15
db 0
db 5
db 7
db 9
db 19
db 27
db 31
db 33
db 5

[Bobingabout]

thanks for the info. 23 is missing, using the system of double+1, i take that to be 11? would be nice to re-arange to remove this pointless gap, but i supose a gap at 11 doesn't matter.

and the double+1 rules also concerns me that you have a 0, shouldn't that be a 1 instead? (0+0=0(double). 0+1=1(+1)). if it works, fair enough, but i recomend you fix this 1, even if you do not do anything else to it.

also 5 is there twice, is that to do with the observer? (translates to LightGrey AKA white. i remember PD saying something about this a long time ago) this forces you to either use white, or change the observer colour. i don't think that matters, but you might want to consider re-numbering things to leave a gap at colour 2 (5) LightGrey.

[VK]

also 5 is there twice, is that to do with the observer? (translates to LightGrey AKA white. i remember PD saying something about this a long time ago) this forces you to either use white, or change the observer colour. i don't think that matters, but you might want to consider re-numbering things to leave a gap at colour 2 (5) LightGrey.

Yes. I know about observer.
It need testing

About 0: I am not sure, but it work?
5 is my error

[Bobingabout]

actually, thats the civilian colour, it might be for house neutral?

if you are renumbering to leave a gap at 5, you might aswell add in 23 aswell.(atleast you won't need to renumber the last 3)
I'd also change 0 to 1 to be on the safe side.