VK
07.06.2007, 15:10:19
At the end who is PD?
Yes, he have started Rock Patch project in the begining of 2005.
But he resigned on 15.09.06 from patch.
This means what he no longer develop and manage it.
the first Rock Patch development period was finished.
The second period of Rock Patch starts with me.
I have different style of manage of project.
Currently I am a one, who is developing and manage a RP status.
Why should I listen PD?
It the same, if someone, yesterday registered on this forum, go and write - "hey, bitch, I don't want Rock Patch name, you must change it".
Possible, he want, that I have leaved this project, because he want to code it itself and he want work alone.
If so I won't irritate him, and go out from project.
@PD: However I don't read your message yet.
However, a lot of lie on RockPatch:Main now.
1) Page was updated by someone who hate me.
ModEnc should contain information from neutral side.
2)
except sometimes I add some testing against bad values.
3)
I only said honestly it, while PD have never done it.
4)
Original:
Bug - when you have IE or feature don't work as declared/described.
If something don't work as you want, this isn't bug.
Example in RP 1.10 - LaserSize tag. This only works if you set IsHouseColor=to yes.
This is because I design it so.
And I wrote about it in help. And I have a stupid "Bug" in BugTracker.
5)
6)
7)
but don't ask/suggest about RP 1.10 with me.
I add BobingAbout to black list, because he directly ask me.
9)
Yes, he have started Rock Patch project in the begining of 2005.
But he resigned on 15.09.06 from patch.
This means what he no longer develop and manage it.
the first Rock Patch development period was finished.
The second period of Rock Patch starts with me.
I have different style of manage of project.
Currently I am a one, who is developing and manage a RP status.
Why should I listen PD?
It the same, if someone, yesterday registered on this forum, go and write - "hey, bitch, I don't want Rock Patch name, you must change it".
Possible, he want, that I have leaved this project, because he want to code it itself and he want work alone.
If so I won't irritate him, and go out from project.
@PD: However I don't read your message yet.
However, a lot of lie on RockPatch:Main now.
1) Page was updated by someone who hate me.
ModEnc should contain information from neutral side.
2)
Quote:constant fights over his codingmy coding style? did you see my code? in my opinion it rather good,
except sometimes I add some testing against bad values.
3)
Quote:t "[He] always test[s] only basic things; [he] assume[s] that other bugs will be found by [the] community."...while PD rather rarely did a basic tests...
I only said honestly it, while PD have never done it.
4)
Quote:declared that a bug was only a bug if it actually triggered an Internal Error (which, logically, would have drastically reduced the number of "bugs" RPCE had)very good trick - delete the end of sentence.
Original:
Bug - when you have IE or feature don't work as declared/described.
If something don't work as you want, this isn't bug.
Example in RP 1.10 - LaserSize tag. This only works if you set IsHouseColor=to yes.
This is because I design it so.
And I wrote about it in help. And I have a stupid "Bug" in BugTracker.
5)
Quote: but he did post an even stricter set of rules with the release of RP 1.10.This just for RP 1.10 only - however each line have RP 1.10.
6)
Quote:he matter was "resolved"No. This isn't resolved.
7)
Quote:n effort to keep down the negative comments about his workthere you find word "negative"?
Quote: trying to prohibit any further discussion of RockPatchYou can discus it with each other.
but don't ask/suggest about RP 1.10 with me.
I add BobingAbout to black list, because he directly ask me.
9)
Quote:elite moddersWho here is "elite modders"?
ARM forever - x86 sucks!