Rock Patch 1.10 development thread

[Renegade]

Im with these two.

Technikly you are forceing VK in to presenting his information in your way. You will not "allow" him to present it his way with out you rewording and reorganizing it. That is a fact. [...]

No it's not. I re-worded one "official" page he created - which was full of slander, badly designed, and not in line with ModEnc:Styleguide. His version, for example, displayed b and c versions as equal to the other releases, but left out his revisions. Clearly a design intended to mislead people about the amount of bugfixing going on.

Had he added his version to RockPatch:Versions in the beginning, had he left out his slander, and had his list been complete, I wouldn't even have touched it. I've got better things to do.

But pretending I won't let anything stand that he wrote is just plain slander on your own part. Check RockPatch:Status, for example - of the fifty latest revisions, there is one by me. You know what that one does? Revert vandalism back to VK's version.

You should really get in your head that, independent from whether or not I like VK's page, I'm also generally administrating ModEnc - and part of that is protecting it from vandals and improving existing pages. What I did was ban a vandal, merge two similar pages, remove slander, and improve the design of a page.
Had I done that to any other page, you couldn't care less. But noooo, it was the versions page, so it must be a hostile attempt to suppress VK.

God. And they laugh about 9/11 conspiracy theories...

You may think its better and it does look better but it is not how he wants his offical page to look or be worded.

Oh, yeah, right...when I'm "misleading" people by giving them real version numbers as guidelines, that's bad.
But when he's misleading people by listing only pd's bugfix-versions and badmouthing only his versions, that's totally fine and not to worry about.

God you're such a hypocrite, it's disgusting.

Forceing somebody is just as bad as threatening them into something.

Forcing him to do what? Make his page not look like crap? Not slandering pd? Not leaving out information?

Oh, forgive me for trying to have ModEnc display accurate information.

(And before you jump, VK, you still fail to give a logical reason why the entire community should believe AIGenerals work if there actually is nothing that could work.)

Ofcourse if he puts it up with slander you can just go edit out said slander without mergeing or changeing anything else. Just as you mentioned to him.

Why would I not merge the pages? The current page shows, matter-of-factly, VK's versioning, and below it, clearly marked at not official, a logical mapping of that versioning to traditional numbers.
What would be the advantage of having this information separate?
What would be the advantage of leaving out VK's revisions?
What would be the advantage of taking out all the release dates, hierarchy and revision notes, and returning to a plain list format?

You can try and play the supporter all you want - there is no logical reason, no advantage of his design over mine or a two-page solution.
He's just crying because my page is better designed as his, and I dared to show that.

VK if hes not going to allow you to change it or express you view on your own page as blade said drop it and continue. [...]

Yeah right...ignore everything I replied and keep pretending I'm suppressing him. At least you're consistent.

An impostor, yes, but a consistent one.