Rock Patch 1.10 development thread

[Renegade]

to King Ren, who start this, not to community.

I kinda don't remember taking RockPatch hostage and making demands, but hey...whatever you have to say to believe it yourself...

Fantastic...Look into Bug Tracker - where only one bug,
and this isn't my lie, it was already said by several community members, that RPCE is very stable.

Hehe, yeah, we've seen your ways to get the bug count down...how many bugs did I have to re-open because you just closed them without a word as wontfix? Ten? Twenty?

About your waiting for a stable RP...

Community already found a lot of bugs, which I fixed immediately
However, PD rarely had tested basic things: look into status page for example

Code:

Fix of the green chronobeams [pd]

If he change beams logic why he didn't test it?
and version later:

Code:

Fixed chrono & radbeam color

Code:

SuperAnims now work for custom SWs

in RP 1.07 ... and this really fixed by me in RPCE revision.
and also RP 1.08 which have IE at start up if you add some SW,
Where here basic tests?

Nice trick, to edit out your very own quote in there...otherwise, people might have realized that there's a difference between trying to check for basic things, and failing, and not even trying in the first place...

However, Good name for RP version.
RPFF

You are aware that "Feisty Fawn" is the name of Ubuntu 7.04, right?

You can save this page, of course.

Why, thank you for the kindness of granting me to keep record of my very own creations! You're so kind, my Lord!

However Why a lot of normal programs have offline help?
It's more easy to create offline help, than to edit ModEnc immediately after release, writting there a lot of bullshit.
Easy to copy later parts from offline help.

Of course it might just be due to the fact that "normal programs" are delivered on offline media as well...

Stupid argument

Why? Because it made more sense than you like?

One page is my, official, and other page(s) is non-offical.

No. There is one RockPatch:Versions page, showing everything there is to say about RockPatch versions.

and "Non-Offical" isn't equal "Traditional".

That's true...because I didn't just make any fantasy shit up, but continued the versioning scheme that has been RockPatch's for eight versions, before you decided it was time for versions without versions.

so return my page back.

Logical reason to create duplicate pages on purpose?

However, who start this?
King Ren of course.

Still with the "King"?
You know, after failing to prove any dictatorial actions of me for half a dozen posts, it's becoming kinda ridiculous...

If I was trying to command people into doing things they don't want to do, purely because of my position, then, yes...

0)King Ren go and create page, where he start to offend me a lot.(look into first his version)

I have already explained multiple times how all terms I used were absolutely accurate. It's not my fault your naming system is wacky, meaningless and repetitive.

1)I replace this page by my, official, content.

No. You deleted half the content without explanation.

2)King Ren return all back without any word.

[...] omitting the summary and leaving us guessing why content was removed will probably lead to a rollback of your revision.

3)I replace it again.

...violating the rules not once, but twice.

4)King Ren protect his page and ban me.

[...] This should only be used as a last resort method to end editing wars, to protect continuously vandalized pages [...]

...and banning vandals isn't new, either.

5)I go and create my own page and put it into Template:RockPatch as official

You created a duplicate, and, again without explanation, removed a previously established link from the template.

6)No, King Ren go and return all back and delete any links to my page.

rofl. "delete any links". It was one link, and it was added as a vandalization. As mentioned multiple times before (and quoted above), it is standing policy to revert any edit that removes information without an explanation. So, especially after several of your violent removals before had been rolled back, you should've known that was coming.

7)Later DCoder go and add Versions A and B

Unhappily named, but at least all information was present, and the version were still divided to be referencable in discussion.

No, King Ren go and delete my page; he merge it with his page and change information from my page also.

1. Liar. I did not delete the page. I turned it into a redirect, so everybody who's going to the old address ends up where the information is.
   
2. ...and I did not change "information" either. You had two things on that page - a list of versions, which I transferred and even marked up better, and a whole lot of slander against pd.
   All I did was not transferring the slander, as it is hardly appropriate for an official page.
   

9)Now.

Yeah, now. Where RockPatch:Versions shows official information, as you wished, but you've been banned from ModEnc due to constant vandalism on the way.

Had you just replaced the one or two words that were offending you (even though they were accurate), everything would be fine...but no, you have your great dictator complex and think it is your god-given right to disregard all rules, act against the community and command everyone around.

Code:

New Features:
PDominator new tags: DomCaptureAll and DomCaptureBuildings
AlternatePrerequisite and NegativePrerequisite first revision
Drop Ship Loadout Screen now work more correctly
AACombat on aircrafts for "Air to Air combats"
DestroyableCliffs now is working correct
IsPermaControlled on warheads for permanent mind control
New upgrade system

See guys? Even VK himself agrees that 1.08 SE is more of a new version than a "b".
And you complain that I mapped it 1.09...

Do not call RPCE RP 1.09 and RPCE isn't RP 1.09.[/code]
So what happened to 1.09?

[quote=CnCVK]However Why you think that PD's way of developing is only one true/good style?

Not the "only one". But the better one. Because pd worked with the community, not against it.

I had checked AIGenerals:
This is bullshit because:
0)Strings AIGenerals don't present in EXE file (also AI.TLB string to)
1)EXE haven't this CLSID.
2)Never CoCreateInstance use this CLSID.
3)This code simple don't exist
4)I play with it and have no effects.
As I see, noone really ,except me, know that is TLB files really is, isn't it?
I can explain this if you want.

Have you added the .tlb?
How many full-length, un-RP'd games did you play to "prove" that nothing happens?
Just because you can't find it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
And I think Marshall (was it him?) explained that the code can be added by the .tlb without having to exist in the .exe.
You still fail to give a logical explanation why DZ should make up pages of stuff about this, and multiple people report success with it.


To those who told me to stop...I'd love to, I really do. This is wasting a lot of my time. But if I don't reply to crap like this, next month, it'll look to other people like I didn't knew to respond to this shit, and his lies were the truth.

Sorry, but this cannot be ended without closure.