Rock Patch 1.10 development thread

[Renegade]

First of all, VK, let me thank you for not addressing the dozens of things I said to you. That makes me confident my reasoning was good.

Now, for your latest ridiculous blabber:

again:
1)the coders of patch don't need any demands

Then resume 1.10 development? After all, you don't need that page to be deleted, right?

2)King Ren is free to do that he want (and he do this).

Is that why you say I have to delete that page, "or else"?

3)about new versions page:who allow you to do this?
you want merge you version with my?
No, I aganist it; this page created by me and not vandalized by me.
and you tell after this, that you do nothing?

I can see now why you went with the Offline Help...you're totally not understanding the concept of wiki.
You do not own any page.
Just like the dozens of _I and _II pages we have, your page was a useless duplicate, a topical overlap that shouldn't even have existed in the first place. I left it standing purely for the sake of the discussion, as it might have calmed you to have your own versions page - since not even the very clear link-renaming ment anything to you, I see no further reason to clutter ModEnc with two seperate versions pages instead of one page explaining them all. And I assume who ever actually saw the current version will agree with me that there's no need for a second one.

4)about AliedG posts;
he doesn't use it, hate it -> so I don't heard his opinions here.
this thread won't be locked;

Yeah, yeah...stupid free speech thingy...

so now King Ren should:
1)return my page back
2)put his page as "Ren's Versions"

With what rationale? What is the logical reason why RockPatch should have two seperate version pages, if one works just fine?
Why should I do that?
Why is the current page not acceptable to my Lord?
Why would I create a page with a possessive page name, if the page is not owned by me?

Just quit the act and admit it's never been about the stupid versions page.

I don't terrorist at all.
All we is totally free here

Really? Then how come you behave just like one? How come, if we're all free here, you want to force me into things?


I would like to point out to everybody that, as soon as RockPatch:Versions contains the official versions, as VK wished,
and the traditional mapping is even more clearly marked as "not official", as VK wished, he goes and says it must be seperated again, not even saying why.

If this was so important to him, why isn't he happy now?


Maybe because I was right all along?

This is not about me, and which version numbers I'd give past RockPatch versions. This is about VK, his ego, and his attitude. Nothing more.

@bob: How do you like the current mapping? It goes against the CE - 1.09 rule, but I thought if it's officially unofficial anyway, we might as well discard the official rules and go with logic instead.