27.04.2007, 19:08:17
Bobingabout Wrote:but the numbering system on that page places 1.08SE as 1.09, PRCE as 1.10, and RPCE74 as 1.11, making 1.10 1.12, which is the part that makes no sence.No - it's the same logic: CE is not 1.09.
Only that I consider the fact that SE had four sub-versions and a new name reason enough to see 1.08 SE as a standalone version, while you just say "1.08 and 1.08 SE are 1.08, 1.10 is 1.10, but RPCE is not 1.09 - THAT DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE."
And, although I'm tired of repeating myself over and over and over and over again, let me point out, once again, the Notes section on RockPatch:Versions, which, quite clearly, points out that I was aware that problem arising, if VK actually released 1.10 as 1.10, and that the numbers would possibly have to be re-ordered in order to line up with VK's occasional numbered release.
iow: You are saying the same as I do. I'm just already past the "WTF? This doesn't make sense?!" stage, while you are still trying to show VK it doesn't make sense.
Once you realize VK isn't open to logic, you'll see that, if CE is not 1.09, there are only two possibilites: Make the version after CE, but before 1.10, 1.09, which would turn CE74 into 1.09, and the entire CE series into the third installment of 1.08, or order it as I did - with 1.08 SE as 1.09, counting from there.
But, as I mentioned, it'll all have to be re-ordered if 1.10 gets released anyway, and we'll then see which magical number we have to pull out of our collective ass to explain a version without number on one hand, and a missing number in the counting on the other.
Forum Rules
(01.06.2011, 05:43:25)kenosis Wrote: Oh damn don't be disgraced again!
(25.06.2011, 20:42:59)Nighthawk Wrote: The proverbial bearded omni-bug may be dead, but the containment campaign is still being waged in the desert.