Rock Patch 1.10 development thread

[Renegade]

sometimes you should break compatibility.
However, all my "renames" have a really reasons.
but PD's: "Change: Spyplane and SpyplanesNum are now SpyPlane and SpyPlanesNum"
have any reason?

You mean other than the fact that every other instance of "SpyPlane" in the rules is "SpyPlane", not "Spyplane"?

What, again, was the reason for your TUT1 renames?

I find a good soulution:
Create OLD subfoler and move here all non-current RP version files.

Yes. Because forcing every single user independently from each other to start version management of your releases is so much better and easier than just adding a version number to the releases.

What color is the sky in your world?

I create a official page RockPatch:VKVersions and did you see that King Ren do?
He simple don't allow me to create official page.

You mean this page, that, according to the history, no one but you touched?

Again I talk this:
King Ren allow on ModEnc only things, which he likes or good in his opinion.
I am not first who said this however.

Sooo...who else says that? And do they have proof to support that claim?

For example, look into AIGenerals. I had proved that this is totally bullshit.
No! King Ren, who know nothing about COM, don't think so.
He can't prove it and change it back.
...and a lot of another tags.

Those who want to see how VK "proved" AIGenerals are "totally bullshit" can take a look here and here.
His strongest arguments:

• "And AIGeneral, which is totally bullshit."
  
• "Rename ai.tlb to aimd.tlb ? - I can laugh only "
  

Impressive, aren't they?
If you watch at the top of Talk:AI, you'll see that, after reverting his first change, I quite clearly say that I don't think he's lying, I'd just like him to go into more details before deleting stuff.

But hey...asking for reasons for deletion and dictatorship are one and the same, right?

This man is soooooooo delusional.

We've tried to persuade him, no results.

As I see, you forgot who is you, isn't?
Did you know assembler for x86? yes?
Did you know windows kernel system? yes?
Did you have any hacking experience? Yes?
I think: No (it's my suggestion however).
So never think about things which you really don't know at all.
main ideas:
1)Coders of patch don't need any demands.
2)NOT ALL things can be done! (in real time)
3)NOT ALL bugs can be fixed! (in real time)

And, as usual, you fail to say how that is in any way connected to the fact that they tried to persuade you to support them again.

Am I the only one who finds it ironic he calls me "King Ren" for no reason at all (and without even trying to remove the evidence that it was the other way round), only to then start another of his "I R TEH CODAR AND I DON'T GIVE A FUCK FOR YOUR OPINIONS" tirades?