Rock Patch 1.10 development thread

[Renegade]

You start to accuse me, althought PD did the same things
(Spyplane -> SpyPlane, SpecialColor, SpyPlane on [General], Dom tags and another)

Did not. pd not release 14 versions in rapid succession which were all officially incompatible to each other. He also didn't rename stuff just for fun. pd tried to maintain compatibility as long as possible, and only broke it if it was impossible to maintain it. Unlike you, who just decided compatibility sucks, and declared everything incompatible.

This don't prove anything at all.

Riiight...because there are so many other people trying to remove that page using your computer.
You're either retarded, arrogant without bounds.

I want that this page contain my official text.

Your propaganda goes against the express purpose and reason for the creation of that page. And so far, you did not bring any logical arguments to change it.

However I don't want to offend PD in any way, although his code sometimes isn't good.
Look into RP 1.08. It was released by PD three times! and the result?
Totally shit - error on load screen!
Where "basic tests" here?

You shouldn't compare my releasing style with PD's style.
I write again: you can still use old style - simple ignore all revisions until next RP comes.

Oooh...it still had bugs after three releases...how often, again, did you release CE?

I always test only basic things; I assume that other bugs will be found by community.

I have nothing to add to that.

again: this the first version which really use revisions, so I can have errors.

How the fuck is the way you name your versions an excuse for your total disregard of compatibility issues?

I am sorry, I thought that people go to RP home page and see last release and press download link.
Now I will use:
RP_<version>_<revision number>.exe format.

As long as you stick to it.
But that doesn't change the fact that
RP_Summer_Edition_0050.exe
RP_Celebration_Edition_0050.exe
RP_Hells_Edition_0050.exe
still doesn't tell the user which one is the latest.

also Delphi: Delphi 6, Delphi 7, Delphi 8, Delphi 2005, Delphi 2006
also Intel: Pentium, Pentium 2, Pentium 3, Pentium 4, Pentium D, Core Duoand others.

Yes. Perfect examples. Delphi is understandable, because one can assume if there is a "2005", the "2006" is newer, and if there are "2005" and "2006" ones, chances are that's the current versioning scheme - and even if that failed, the simple reasoning that Borland probably hasn't released Delphi 6-8 within the past 4 months should be enough to conclude "2006" is the latest.
Not to mention that the Delphi part of Developer Studio 2006 is actually called "Delphi 10", but hey...who's nitpicking...

As for the Intel processors - yes. They are totally confusing. So confusing, in fact, that everytime I want to buy a processor, I need several webpages to find out which processor is the latest, and, from those, which core architecture is current. I'd appreciate it if they changed that, but I guess a brand marketing their shit to a billion potential customers has different needs than one lone madman releasing code for a dozen modders.

my page allow do it very simple.

Your page does it just as well as mine, only with additional slander.
Thanks for the insight on your future planned version names, though. (This page, for those who haven't seen it yet.)
Now I'm absolutely confident RockPatch:Versions is needed.