Rock Patch 1.10 development thread

[Renegade]

No.PD's "a b c" - isn't revision, it's versions.

Ooh, you think renaming the bugfix-versions to "revisions" is gonna save your ass here?
They're all releases. Your "revisions" are publically released versions of RockPatch just like pd's bugfix versions were.
Either you treat them all equally, or you stfu. But nobody here is stupid enough to not notice this cheap cover-up of the fact that of 17 versions you released, 14 were bugfix-versions just like pd's b and c releases.

You should forget about it - it's in history!
(I delete all RPCE and RPCE74 installers except RPCE #0051& RPCE74 #0102)
However this only first version, which use revisions system, so it can have some issues

Ah...so your faults of the past are irrelevant, because they're in the past, but pd's are relevant for the discussion?
You are so ridiculous. You can't seriously believe you can cherry-pick your goods and pd's bads here?

I don't need Ren's opinions about version;
My version is very clear and right
So it must there instead of this stupid one.
But the King of Mod Enc Ren don't think so.

Riiight...so let me get this straight:
I tell everyone, both here and at ModEnc, that it's no problem to change the numbering on the page, as long as there's a good reason to do so, even noticing right on the article page that it might be necessary if you release 1.10, too keep the numbers in line, while you sit here screaming "NOOOO!!! MY NUMBERS ARE TEH ALPHA AND TEH OMEGA!!!! I DON'T NEED NO HELP WITH THEM!!!!! FUCK YOUR OPINIONS!!!!!!"
...and say I behave like a king? You are delusional on a scale not even I had anticipated.

And why are you criticising Renegade for what he puts on his site. If it was your site, and he started putting stuff up that you didn't want, then yes, you have reason to complain, but it's not your site. Renegade even says in his rules that he owns the domain and pays for this whole thing, so what he says goes, and he has a right to do that, whereas you do not, even if you are coding an exe-hacking project that has many modders (including myself) relying on it.

Even though this is true, it is in no way my reasoning or intention. I'm not forcing this through pointing at the WHOIS saying "Leave me alone or else..." (unlike certain other participants in this discussion) - I just don't see any logical reason to take that page down. It does not affect RockPatch at all. Heck, it wouldn't even be necessary, had Mr. VK decided to continue a simple numbering scheme.
But nooo, he had to stubbornly push his naming through, and is now pissed that we/I consider it so fucked up that an explanation page for newbies is necessary.
On the other hand, maybe he just wants to vanish all evidence, go on to 1.10, and pretend this fucked up naming scheme never happened...