20.04.2007, 16:40:21
CnCVK Wrote:I have never said that I want to quit from RP project.Yeeeees. And the US don't wage war for oil...they "protect their country from global terrorism".
I just "suspend" it.
CnCVK Wrote:Quote:in no way is or claims to be official.and why it in RockPatch_Docs: namespace?.
- It isn't.
- It is in RockPatch: for a simple reason: It is information relating to RockPatch ( Makes sense, doesn't it?). Or are you suggesting all information in the XCC: namespace is official and from Olaf van der Spek as well?
CnCVK Wrote:...and then ignore it.Quote:You have ignored every input from the communityI always read and analyse it.
CnCVK Wrote:If you talk about wishes - the coders of patch don't need any demands.No. I'm talking about stuff like consistent, sane versioning, more stable (less frequent) releases, beta-testing, no useless renaming of stuff in between versions...and if I felt like searching through the hundreds of posts on this topic, I'd probably find a dozen more things.
CnCVK Wrote:lol...of course your page is simpler - it's inconsistent! (Suprise!)Quote:If he wanted to, he could just ignore the page, while newcomers could use it to get an orientation of which version to download.My version of this page allow it to.
and it more simple (read attached page from RP 1.10 help).
Either you list revisions, then you have to list all of them, adding at least another 14 versions to your list, or you don't, then it shrinks down to
- Rock Patch 1.11 (non-released yet)
- Rock Patch 1.10
- Rock Patch Celebration Edition 74
- Rock Patch Celebration Edition
- Rock Patch 1.08 SE
- Rock Patch 1.08
- Rock Patch 1.07
- Rock Patch 1.06
- Rock Patch 1.05
- Rock Patch 1.04
- Rock Patch 1.03
- Rock Patch 1.02
- Rock Patch 1.01
- Rock Patch 1.00
CnCVK Wrote:You could empty it, only to have it restored. Or you could try to hack the server, leading to legal action to me, and that I'd have to inform the other community webmasters of your dangerous character traits...not sure anybody else would host you if your last host kicked you out because you hacked him for his personal opinion...Quote:He can't, because he tried.xa-xa-xa
Removing any content from ModEnc without
a logical reason or consent is considered
vandalism - and since he decided to vandalize
the page rather than to discuss changes multiple
times, he's currently under a three day ban.
I can delete it every day
...not to mention that we have database backups, so it's not like that would change anything either.
CnCVK Wrote:I thought you could do it yourself? Do you need other people to get banned, so you can claim I'm attacking the community, abusing my power to spread lies? Oh pleaseQuote:You don't get permission,No. Do it!
CnCVK Wrote:Yes. And that is the problem.Quote:and that, quite clearly, states that CE is not 1.09.RPCE isn't a.b.c,
where:
a = 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,....
b = 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,....
c = 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,....
CnCVK Wrote:About that RPCE not compatible with previous versions of Rock Patch -Did so. Found no note of incompatibility?
nothing bad here, it already be incompatible three times: 1.05, 1.06, 1.07.
Read status page again
And, you seem to make a mental mistake there...let's assume you were right, and 1.05, 1.06 and 1.07 were incompatible with previous versions (for which you brought forth no proof). Then out of nine versions pd released, three were incompatible with earlier versions.
Even if one assumes 1.08 SE is compatible with earlier versions (of which I'm not convinced), that still means that, from three versions you released, two were not compatible with earlier versions.
And that is just the superficial look. Because, other than you, pd did not declare his revisions incompatible with their parent versions. Meaning that even though 1.05 may not have been compatible with 1.04c, 1.05b and 1.05c were compatible with 1.05.
Can you say the same about you? Your official position for CE is that no version is or has to be compatible with the previous version, meaning, looking at it right from the official VK point of view, your last fourteen releases were incompatible with each other.
There is a big difference between breaking compatibility because it's necessary, and breaking compatibility because you're too lazy to guarantee it and enjoy renaming things. So don't try to drag pd's work down to your level. It's cheap, even for you.
CnCVK Wrote:it's simple RPCE, not moreYes. It is basically a different project. Not "RockPatch" anymore, but "RPCE". That may be good for you, 'cause you got the spirit of pd out and turned this into your own, personal assembly playground, but that doesn't mean I or anyone else has to like it. And we have the right to voice our dislike for it.
Forum Rules
(01.06.2011, 05:43:25)kenosis Wrote: Oh damn don't be disgraced again!
(25.06.2011, 20:42:59)Nighthawk Wrote: The proverbial bearded omni-bug may be dead, but the containment campaign is still being waged in the desert.