13.02.2007, 22:24:36
Quote:Documentation. RPCE help is full of errors 0/10already no
Quote:New Features. RPCE has some, but their usefulness is questionable 3/10 (as said, iron cannon could be done with dom clone.)Why you talk only about Ion Cannon?
Did you see a new DropPod SW, RandMap.Map, custom attack cursor for weapon and full new actions support?
Quote:After that all the clones and other stuff got fucked up. ÂÂall is working
1, 8/10  Stability/Bug Fixing.
2, 0/10  Continuity.Not compatible with older versions.         ÂÂ
3, 9/10  Documentation. Most of errors was fixed
4, 3/10  New Features. See 1 ÂÂ
5, 10/10 Ease of use. Very easy. Install, read help, write code, check in game
total: 30/50
Quote:plus i pointed out an un-documented feature, those new superweapon tags work on old superweapons tooundocumented?
I talk about it already(or not?):New SW system don't separate old, original, SW and new, added SWs.
Common tags works with all, except ChronoShepe.
Quote:I believe that the next version of RP should focus SOLELY on bugfixing, stability, and compatiblity.this version
Quote:it does seem that the RP has gone backwards more than it has gone forwardsHowever, in current chaos with RPCE help, I can remind you, what all features, which was supported bt RP 1.08 SE
supported in RPCE.
Quote:You probably can't imagine being able to change anything you like in the game.But not with this style of code...
There are no limits, truely no limits.
Quote:RP go downRP not go down.
You should check it after one week
ARM forever - x86 sucks!