Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
To replace or not to replace.
#1
It's just hit me that the Assault Police Car is a bit cheesy. Yuri's Modified School Bus makes sense (it's a transport that he modified), the Soviet Double Decker Paradox Bus makes sense (the Sovs modified a double decker bus with slight chrono-expansion technology) and the Stealth Limo even makes sense as a transport with an installed stealth generator.

But the Police Car is a bit weird. It's just a car, yet apparently the Allies added 2 potent weapons and armour. I want to change the image of this thing to something that looks like a high-tech tank, or even a Mech. I'd also change the name. I was thinking "Deity Tank".

The weapons it has I definately don't want to change, but this is a poll and I'd like you opinions. Primary weapon is a long range "freezing" beam that literally stops buildigns and vehicles from doing anything (they cannot be attacked when "frozen"). Secondary weapon is medium-range mini-missiles that can target infantry and aircraft.

I think that such a weapon package looks a bit strange coming from a humble police car. Tell me what you think. It'd be nice to post images of what you think it should look like, as well as ideas for names Tongue



Messages In This Thread
To replace or not to replace. - by Whiteboy - 24.02.2006, 16:18:00
To replace or not to replace. - by particle - 24.02.2006, 17:11:00
To replace or not to replace. - by DCoder - 24.02.2006, 18:25:00
To replace or not to replace. - by The Eagle - 24.02.2006, 18:56:00
To replace or not to replace. - by Wrath - 24.02.2006, 23:13:00
To replace or not to replace. - by The Eagle - 25.02.2006, 00:03:00
To replace or not to replace. - by zero2 - 25.02.2006, 03:48:00
To replace or not to replace. - by The Eagle - 25.02.2006, 08:08:00
To replace or not to replace. - by Wrath - 25.02.2006, 14:27:00
To replace or not to replace. - by Whiteboy - 25.02.2006, 15:55:00
To replace or not to replace. - by zero2 - 26.02.2006, 10:51:00
To replace or not to replace. - by Whiteboy - 26.02.2006, 11:51:00
To replace or not to replace. - by Wrath - 26.02.2006, 15:10:00
To replace or not to replace. - by Hopalongtom - 26.02.2006, 20:14:00
To replace or not to replace. - by Whiteboy - 27.02.2006, 10:09:00
To replace or not to replace. - by Wrath - 27.02.2006, 12:55:00
To replace or not to replace. - by particle - 27.02.2006, 15:09:00
To replace or not to replace. - by Wrath - 27.02.2006, 22:14:00
To replace or not to replace. - by particle - 27.02.2006, 22:20:00
To replace or not to replace. - by SaberHawk - 27.02.2006, 22:48:00
To replace or not to replace. - by Hopalongtom - 28.02.2006, 09:56:00
To replace or not to replace. - by Whiteboy - 28.02.2006, 13:05:00
To replace or not to replace. - by DCoder - 28.02.2006, 13:34:00
To replace or not to replace. - by particle - 28.02.2006, 15:31:00
To replace or not to replace. - by Whiteboy - 02.03.2006, 09:46:00
To replace or not to replace. - by Alex05 - 08.03.2006, 04:37:00
To replace or not to replace. - by Whiteboy - 08.03.2006, 12:48:00
To replace or not to replace. - by particle - 08.03.2006, 15:24:00
To replace or not to replace. - by Whiteboy - 09.03.2006, 15:06:00



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)