Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD-R4: 1009 vs. 349, 510 vs. 765
#9
This is gonna be a quick one. Big Grin 2

Fight 1

Yes. #1009 will probably be fulfilled in the Slaves request anyway.

Kill: #1009
Support: #349

Fight 2

I want my battleships. So there. Tongue

Even if I didn't, though, I was never really excited about #765. It's a reasonable request, it's just...meh. Fine, it's a limitation that you can only really have one or the other, but it's worked out alright so far. It not like the fact that you can't have guns on bunkers is preventing some breathtaking new breakthrough in YR modding. It's kinda sucky, but not all that important.

RA's battleship, on the other hand, is legendary, and I'm very sure the community would find enough uses for a second turret. Hell, if (if) we implement TurretSpins for both turrets individually, you could even abuse this feature to have a one-turret-unit with a spinning radar dish in the back or something.

Kill: #765
Support: #510
Forum Rules

(01.06.2011, 05:43:25)kenosis Wrote: Oh damn don't be disgraced again!

(25.06.2011, 20:42:59)Nighthawk Wrote: The proverbial bearded omni-bug may be dead, but the containment campaign is still being waged in the desert.


Messages In This Thread
DFD-R4: 1009 vs. 349, 510 vs. 765 - by Renegade - 03.10.2010, 21:37:07
RE: DFD-R4: 1009 vs. 349, 510 vs. 765 - by Orac - 04.10.2010, 00:26:57
RE: DFD-R4: 1009 vs. 349, 510 vs. 765 - by Renegade - 09.10.2010, 14:00:31
RE: DFD-R4: 1009 vs. 349, 510 vs. 765 - by AlexB - 10.10.2010, 00:51:50



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)