Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 479 vs. 766, 286 vs. 715
#10
Fight 1

While I agree #766 is more of a bug than a feature, it comes down to what I've been telling people again and again and again and again: File your issues properly or they end up in the wrong selections.

The requester decided to file this thing as a feature request, so it'll be treated as one - and as a feature request, it's worthless.

#479 is sporting annoying dot-abuse in a flag that shouldn't exist, but ignoring the silly idea of having a flag for something that should be the normal case, the request makes sense, is narrow, has a clear, defined outcome and results in a direct improvement of the game.
It is clearly the superior choice.

Kill: #766
Support: #479

Fight 2

Oh look, more upgrade requests - since we have so few of them! I dislike voting for yet another "Improve upgrades" issue, but Alex is right - #286 is a hack and nothing more.

Kill: #286
Support: #715

Since Alex voted the same way, this is the result.
Forum Rules

(01.06.2011, 05:43:25)kenosis Wrote: Oh damn don't be disgraced again!

(25.06.2011, 20:42:59)Nighthawk Wrote: The proverbial bearded omni-bug may be dead, but the containment campaign is still being waged in the desert.


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 479 vs. 766, 286 vs. 715 - by Renegade - 22.07.2010, 20:31:55
RE: DFD: 479 vs. 766, 286 vs. 715 - by reaperrr - 22.07.2010, 22:46:33
RE: DFD: 479 vs. 766, 286 vs. 715 - by Beowulf - 23.07.2010, 02:17:25
RE: DFD: 479 vs. 766, 286 vs. 715 - by Blade - 23.07.2010, 12:46:31
RE: DFD: 479 vs. 766, 286 vs. 715 - by MRMIdAS - 23.07.2010, 21:02:15
RE: DFD: 479 vs. 766, 286 vs. 715 - by Nighthawk - 24.07.2010, 02:46:20
RE: DFD: 479 vs. 766, 286 vs. 715 - by Renegade - 27.07.2010, 02:52:41
RE: DFD: 479 vs. 766, 286 vs. 715 - by AlexB - 29.07.2010, 04:02:05
RE: DFD: 479 vs. 766, 286 vs. 715 - by Renegade - 06.08.2010, 02:18:12



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)