Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 329 vs. 339, 350 vs. 615
#1
DFD: Daily Feature Deathmatch

The Cruel Fight For Implementation

This is a Daily Feature Deathmatch post. If you are unfamiliar with the background of this event, please read the announcement, the adjustment and the schedule.

Fight 1

[0000329] "Cannot target this" function for Custom Cursors vs. [0000339] turret turning

Fight 2

[0000350] Make waypoints save. vs. [0000615] The ability to set a refinery's docking cell(s)

After the fight is over, two of these issues will be suspended, while the other two move on to the next round.
Remember that the coders will not take part in the discussion, so make your arguments complete, concise and convincing - when it's over, it's over.

Part of that is clearly marking what outcome you support for which issue.
There should be no ambiguity in the issue you're talking about, and it should be clear what outcome you support. Feel free to put your stance in bold, and use simple terminology like "kill #69" or "I want #42 to survive".
This use of simple terminology should be part of a larger argumentation - if this is all your post consists of, it will be ignored. We are interested in argumentations and details to consider, not votes.

A decision will be made either way, a lack of discussion will not cause all issues to live.

Be friendly, be civil, be logical.
You are allowed to try to deconstruct the arguments of those arguing against your candidate, but remember that they don't make the call - there is really no point in getting personal.

The discussion should be contained in this thread, argumentations elsewhere will be ignored, but you are allowed to transfer and adapt points made elsewhere in the past.

We want a good, clean fight.
Let's get it on! Dual M16

These fights are largely automatically generated - if an issue turns out to be unfit for combat, it will be disqualified and the opponent will go into the queue.
Forum Rules

(01.06.2011, 05:43:25)kenosis Wrote: Oh damn don't be disgraced again!

(25.06.2011, 20:42:59)Nighthawk Wrote: The proverbial bearded omni-bug may be dead, but the containment campaign is still being waged in the desert.


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 329 vs. 339, 350 vs. 615 - by Renegade - 22.07.2010, 20:26:14
RE: DFD: 329 vs. 339, 350 vs. 615 - by Beowulf - 23.07.2010, 01:36:05
RE: DFD: 329 vs. 339, 350 vs. 615 - by Beowulf - 23.07.2010, 03:18:34
RE: DFD: 329 vs. 339, 350 vs. 615 - by MRMIdAS - 23.07.2010, 22:29:59
RE: DFD: 329 vs. 339, 350 vs. 615 - by Renegade - 27.07.2010, 02:54:27
RE: DFD: 329 vs. 339, 350 vs. 615 - by Renegade - 27.07.2010, 03:29:13
RE: DFD: 329 vs. 339, 350 vs. 615 - by AlexB - 04.08.2010, 17:23:11
RE: DFD: 329 vs. 339, 350 vs. 615 - by Renegade - 05.08.2010, 23:32:44



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)