Renegade
18.07.2010, 22:24:16
Fight 1
The way it is phrased, #372 is mostly a duplicate of #518 (which already survived round 1 last week), in that it wants waypoints for aircraft. However, since the mechanism it proposes is slightly different, I will decide upon it independently.
That being said, I think both issues are stupid - waypoints are a user-management-feature, not an ingame-combat-feature. The ability to use them shouldn't randomly be taken away - that's the same as randomly deciding that the player shouldn't be able to use the stop hotkey to stop tanks and only tanks anymore. It makes no sense. It's a player control function, and should be completely and entirely independent from the game content.
And the Barrel request is just silly...barrels with no turret? The fuck? Hardcoded to not be able to spin, too?
I would love to hear a usage case for that that doesn't involve smoking crack beforehand. Not to mention that Albrecht and others already pointed out that it can easily be done in the game as it is.
Alas, one has to die, one has to survive, and since I sure as hell don't want some n00b to take my controls away from me, the barrel crap will survive for now.
But rest assured, I'll kill it at the first chance I get.
Kill #372
Support #333
Fight 2
#324's inclusion in this contest is testament to the fact that, due to the volume of issues, I did the selection and pairing automatically.
It's not a real issue to discuss, and therefore, #586 wins by default.
Sorry about that, but events like this underline why we're having this contest - we have so overwhelmingly many issues that we've lost overview.
Kill #324
Support #586
The way it is phrased, #372 is mostly a duplicate of #518 (which already survived round 1 last week), in that it wants waypoints for aircraft. However, since the mechanism it proposes is slightly different, I will decide upon it independently.
That being said, I think both issues are stupid - waypoints are a user-management-feature, not an ingame-combat-feature. The ability to use them shouldn't randomly be taken away - that's the same as randomly deciding that the player shouldn't be able to use the stop hotkey to stop tanks and only tanks anymore. It makes no sense. It's a player control function, and should be completely and entirely independent from the game content.
And the Barrel request is just silly...barrels with no turret? The fuck? Hardcoded to not be able to spin, too?
I would love to hear a usage case for that that doesn't involve smoking crack beforehand. Not to mention that Albrecht and others already pointed out that it can easily be done in the game as it is.
Alas, one has to die, one has to survive, and since I sure as hell don't want some n00b to take my controls away from me, the barrel crap will survive for now.
But rest assured, I'll kill it at the first chance I get.
Kill #372
Support #333
Fight 2
#324's inclusion in this contest is testament to the fact that, due to the volume of issues, I did the selection and pairing automatically.
It's not a real issue to discuss, and therefore, #586 wins by default.
Sorry about that, but events like this underline why we're having this contest - we have so overwhelmingly many issues that we've lost overview.
Kill #324
Support #586
Forum Rules
(01.06.2011, 05:43:25)kenosis Wrote: Oh damn don't be disgraced again!
(25.06.2011, 20:42:59)Nighthawk Wrote: The proverbial bearded omni-bug may be dead, but the containment campaign is still being waged in the desert.