Poll: When should the UC.DaMO happen?
This poll is closed.
Not at all
6.25%
1 6.25%
In Ares 0.2, delaying the recreated Radar Jammer effect
0%
0 0%
In Ares 0.2, delaying the Extended Slave System
0%
0 0%
In Ares 0.3, delaying Active Protection Systems/Shields
6.25%
1 6.25%
In Ares 0.3, delaying the Morale / Bravery / Panic System
25.00%
4 25.00%
In Ares 0.5
62.50%
10 62.50%
Total 16 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Discuss: Urban Combat Damage Model Overhaul
#6
* Renegade can't help but notice that, for something that is supposedly oh-so-important for uncountable numbers of modders, this discussion is rather short and lifeless...

Anyway, I added a small edit to the OP - since UC.DamageDistributionRatio=0% would logically be the same thing as UC.DamageDistributionRatio=100%, only in reverse (i.e. "send 100% of the damage to the target not chosen", instead of "send 100% of the damage to the target chosen"), I could make that one a special case to never deal occupant damage.
So you'd have
  • UC.DamageDistributionRatio=0% - never deal damage to occupants, always damage the building
  • UC.DamageDistributionRatio=1-99% - damage both the occupants and the building, applying this many percent of the damage to the target chosen by PassThrough. (UC.DamageDistributionRatio=50% would, logically, always damage both equally, safe for the occasional fatal hit on an occupant)
  • UC.DamageDistributionRatio=100% - always deal full damage to the target chosen by PassThrough
Forum Rules

(01.06.2011, 05:43:25)kenosis Wrote: Oh damn don't be disgraced again!

(25.06.2011, 20:42:59)Nighthawk Wrote: The proverbial bearded omni-bug may be dead, but the containment campaign is still being waged in the desert.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Discuss: Urban Combat Damage Model Overhaul - by Renegade - 16.03.2010, 08:14:37



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)