Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rock Patch 1.10 development thread
Mevitar Wrote:And on the next episode of RTB soap opera Renegade is going to say he hates VK, while VK will say that this is all bullshit Smile
The action, the drama, the thrill!!
Don't miss the next episode!!
Can we have guest stars? I'm for Paris Hilton and Nicole Richie, they'd fit right in.

Mevitar Wrote:Now seriously, i'm also fed up with what's going on on this forum and i also think VK should use the old numeric system, but hey:
1) RTB Patch called either way is still the same RTB Patch
2) who really cares? i mean: is it REALLY worth all this argues?

Yeah, i know, it's for newcomers to know which version of the patch was earlier, so i don't have anything about giving a "translation" of "Wacky VK Designation" to old numerical system, the problem is with the word Wacky.
The problem is not the word "wacky". VK has edited that page multiple times, if that was his problem, it'd have been out of the page for weeks.
The problem is that he can't accept that he can't dominate me like the rest of you.

Mevitar Wrote:to Renegade:
I know you may be pissed off by VK's attitude, but this doesn't mean YOU have to piss off others too. If VK really was acting that bad, you're not acting better than him now. If this wasn't your forum you'd probably been banned already.

And please, don't try to explain yourself or tell me that i'm dumb or something. I'm fed up with all this, and i see i'm not alone.
I think you still don't get the situation either. I'm not doing much. I just don't delete stuff on VK's demands. That's totally legitimate behavior. None of the people here, including you, would delete stuff on their websites if I came along and said "You must delete that for I don't like it."
Yet you expect me to do that just because VK demands it? How is my site and my opinion worth less than yours or anybody else's here?

MadHQ Wrote:[Most of his post]
I'll take your lack of responses to my retorts as an indication that you realized how stupid your post was.

MadHQ Wrote:And I just have to say this forum or network or what ever you wanna call it has some bad admin control. Why I say this is because some one put my "aka" to "My an idiot" LOL now that right there is pretty funny, because who ever put that there doesn't know grammar for shit. LOL But I TBH cant really say to much as my grammar is shit... LOL
LOL
This is hilarious on so many levels.

CnCVK Wrote:[...]
First of all the current problem:
that King Ren named this page as "traditional'
Newbies will see think that this official, but another version system.
However I don't find anything about non-official version on King Ren's page.

  1. You do realize how ridiculous it is to call me "King Ren" while I'm talking of consent within the community, and you try to reign as God's King and dictate my actions, right? Lift eyebrow
  2. Yes. Because if one is labeled "official", it makes totally sense to think the one not labeled "official" is official as well. How could I not see the logic? Rolling eyes
  3. It clearly says "This numbering scheme is not endorsed by VK" - how could it be official if you don't like it? It's simple logic...
    ...although that may be the problem.

CnCVK Wrote:Of course I will remove link to King Ren's page.
You (King Ren) should rename it to non-official, write with big letters "non-official" and remove all things, which offend me.
Nothing more.
Yes, my Lord...if it offends you, I shall of course remove it at once! *bows*

...then again, MadHQ said you can't force me to do anything?

Bobingabout Wrote:you should probably split most of the convo from post #10.

the argument has nothing to do with 1.10 development, maybe name the split "VK's coding strike" or something.
While, on one level, I agree with you, it was VK, after all, leading the thread to the current topic, and it is the discussion about the future of 1.10. So it is on topic just as much as it is off topic. Since I am a supporter of thread evolution, I'll not change anything for not. There's no 1.10 development to talk about right now anyway.

Bobingabout Wrote:erm Rolling eyes it is an argument over nothing.

i don't agree with the numbering system on the version page, a simple order will do, and even if you insist on numbers, the ones on the page make absolutly no sense at all. [...]
Wait, let me get this straight...at the beginning of the post, you say the numbering makes no sense...

Bobingabout Wrote:but VK did say "RPCE is not 1.09", so, if we are doing 1.10 now, where is 1.09? RPCE IS 1.09, cncvk just changed his mind, and if you want to give RPCE74 a number, it's probably 1.09 and a half. which would be 1.09.5, but, can't have a decimal there.

[...]
...only to then use my exact reasoning?

CnCVK Wrote:Don't like -don't use.
Out of interest...what's your character's level on the "Hypocrisy" skill?
If you practised what you preach, we wouldn't have this discussion...

gamemate Wrote:First off I am no admin, I am staff member at Revora...

I am not going to argue with Renegade, there is no point. There is only one right way and that is the Renegades way, anything else is wrong.

And yes I am one of the most arrogant, stupid and brainless people around. And proud of it Smile
Actually, seeing your avatar now, I realize I was thinking of Godwin, not of you. In my defense, it was 3 o' clock in the morning, and I was replying to three different people at once...it's easy to mix up two nicks starting with "G" there.

Please accept my sincere apologies...it was an honest mistake, and that is not the opinion I have of you. Unhappy

AlliedG Wrote:[...]
In the end VK does have power over us because none of us can decompile and modify it properly, if it was so easy, it would have done during deezire's day and until PD and VK done, the most we could do was exe file and hex edit.[...]
Actually, that's not quite true...the thing is, back in the day, people were focusing on the .tlbs, not the exe. Hence pd's iconic words "Who needs TLB files to modify the game?". In other words, it's not that nobody could do it, it's that nobody tried. (At least not publically or on a large scale.)

AlliedG Wrote:yes indeed, sorry for not crediting him, but really this thread is hilarious Big Grin 2
In a bittersweet way, yes...on one hand, this argument is blown way out of proportions, ensuring hilarity, on the other hand, it's just sad and disgusting how obedient and submissive everybody is towards VK.

CnCVK Wrote:Nobody don't ask you about your comments about this thread.
Yeah, we know...you don't like personal opinions. We get it. Now leave him alone. The very fact that you still insist on having the authority to command deletions on random website is contributing a great deal to the hilarity. If you behaved like a normal human being, there'd be no discussion for him to comment on.
Forum Rules

(01.06.2011, 05:43:25)kenosis Wrote: Oh damn don't be disgraced again!

(25.06.2011, 20:42:59)Nighthawk Wrote: The proverbial bearded omni-bug may be dead, but the containment campaign is still being waged in the desert.


Messages In This Thread
Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 16.04.2007, 20:54:06
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 18.04.2007, 11:52:08
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 19.04.2007, 08:45:22
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 19.04.2007, 13:03:52
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 20.04.2007, 16:00:32
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 21.04.2007, 12:22:26
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 21.04.2007, 12:56:01
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 21.04.2007, 22:25:09
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Blade - 22.04.2007, 14:59:21
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 22.04.2007, 15:00:34
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 22.04.2007, 22:52:31
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by MadHQ - 23.04.2007, 07:14:42
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by MadHQ - 23.04.2007, 18:30:55
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 23.04.2007, 21:53:34
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by MadHQ - 24.04.2007, 03:30:43
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 24.04.2007, 08:17:36
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by MadHQ - 25.04.2007, 06:14:39
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Guest - 24.04.2007, 23:36:47
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 25.04.2007, 09:56:47
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by MadHQ - 25.04.2007, 20:06:14
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Guest - 25.04.2007, 21:10:56
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 26.04.2007, 09:54:40
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 26.04.2007, 13:39:05
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by MadHQ - 26.04.2007, 23:23:46
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by MadHQ - 27.04.2007, 00:34:53
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by MadHQ - 27.04.2007, 06:35:28
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 27.04.2007, 10:56:24
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Guest - 27.04.2007, 11:30:05
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 27.04.2007, 13:30:58
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 27.04.2007, 16:16:30
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Renegade - 27.04.2007, 17:43:24
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Djohe from PPM - 27.04.2007, 21:21:24
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by /-\G@/\/\ - 27.04.2007, 23:31:31
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 28.04.2007, 13:36:30
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by FS-21 - 28.04.2007, 16:38:34
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by FS-21 - 28.04.2007, 18:13:49
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 29.04.2007, 21:57:55
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Guest - 29.04.2007, 22:44:10
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 30.04.2007, 23:00:33
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Blade - 01.05.2007, 01:58:23
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 01.05.2007, 21:45:06
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 02.05.2007, 08:42:24
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 02.05.2007, 12:55:52
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by /-\G@M - 03.05.2007, 00:00:55
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Blade - 03.05.2007, 01:32:49
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 03.05.2007, 11:52:21
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 03.05.2007, 15:35:50
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 03.05.2007, 21:50:21
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by tmapm - 04.05.2007, 00:26:10
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 04.05.2007, 07:46:57
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by R=Peder - 05.05.2007, 00:06:31
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 05.05.2007, 11:43:43
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 05.05.2007, 22:00:01
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by tmapm - 06.05.2007, 08:09:42
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by /-\G@/\/\ - 08.05.2007, 18:53:01
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by /-\G@/\/\ - 09.05.2007, 17:50:50
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Marko - 12.05.2007, 19:45:15
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 15.05.2007, 07:46:47
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 15.05.2007, 13:39:48
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 18.05.2007, 19:08:38
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 19.05.2007, 08:40:04
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Guest - 20.05.2007, 01:44:36
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 20.05.2007, 22:04:05
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by ----------- - 20.05.2007, 23:26:00
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by modder666666 (guest) - 21.05.2007, 01:43:24
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 22.05.2007, 11:54:39
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 23.05.2007, 12:59:50
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Blade - 23.05.2007, 22:34:38
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 24.05.2007, 15:53:46
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Unknow... - 25.05.2007, 14:26:55
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Guest - 02.06.2007, 19:01:37
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by MCV - 03.06.2007, 21:02:15
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 04.06.2007, 21:38:17
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Mike - 04.06.2007, 23:03:57
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 06.06.2007, 18:57:57
[split] RPCE #0052 & RPCE74 #0106 - by Guest - 16.05.2007, 05:06:12



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)