Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 564 vs. 275, 732 vs. 331
#12
Fight 1

Oh look, another mission progression request. It truly is Duplicate Hour. Rolling eyes

I have nothing against cheats in general, especially "fun" cheats like the ones in AoE, but in C&C, it's just wrong.
The game and those before it have been carefully cleansed of all cheats there may have been, with THETEAM remaining the only remnant, likely because it was just plain forgotten during crunch time.
More importantly, even if game cheats it weren't grossly against C&C tradition, introducing cheats into multiplayer, where the user not only cheats himself, but actually has the chance of conning unsuspecting users into giving him an unfair advantage, is just a no-no.
No matter how much the other side would first have to install the files, there are always morons and there are always assholes, and I refuse to potentially abet malevolent multiplayer cheaters.

Even if this request, through some weird chain of events, ends up in Ares, I will not assist with it in any way.

Then again, the majority seems to lean towards #564, so it's likely a moot point anyway.

Kill: #275
Support: #564


Fight 2

While the Generals Troop Crawler request would certainly be practical ingame, SpawnDock sounds more interesting as a feature. It reminds me of Empire Earth's and Rise of Nation's airfields. It should make for great automated drone defense turrets, for example.

Alas, Nighthawk and Albrecht are right.
YR's engine isn't exactly made for that kind of feature, and pre-filled passenger vehicles would increase the probability the AI uses them properly.

Meh.

Kill: #331
Support: #732
Forum Rules

(01.06.2011, 05:43:25)kenosis Wrote: Oh damn don't be disgraced again!

(25.06.2011, 20:42:59)Nighthawk Wrote: The proverbial bearded omni-bug may be dead, but the containment campaign is still being waged in the desert.


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 564 vs. 275, 732 vs. 331 - by Renegade - 22.07.2010, 20:28:25
RE: DFD: 564 vs. 275, 732 vs. 331 - by reaperrr - 23.07.2010, 01:27:51
RE: DFD: 564 vs. 275, 732 vs. 331 - by Beowulf - 23.07.2010, 03:09:36
RE: DFD: 564 vs. 275, 732 vs. 331 - by mt. - 23.07.2010, 03:54:50
RE: DFD: 564 vs. 275, 732 vs. 331 - by Blade - 23.07.2010, 13:00:15
RE: DFD: 564 vs. 275, 732 vs. 331 - by MRMIdAS - 23.07.2010, 20:54:26
RE: DFD: 564 vs. 275, 732 vs. 331 - by Nighthawk - 24.07.2010, 02:17:51
RE: DFD: 564 vs. 275, 732 vs. 331 - by Orac - 26.07.2010, 12:31:07
RE: DFD: 564 vs. 275, 732 vs. 331 - by Renegade - 28.07.2010, 23:23:18
RE: DFD: 564 vs. 275, 732 vs. 331 - by Renegade - 06.08.2010, 04:47:36
RE: DFD: 564 vs. 275, 732 vs. 331 - by AlexB - 07.08.2010, 04:20:16
RE: DFD: 564 vs. 275, 732 vs. 331 - by Renegade - 07.08.2010, 06:48:07



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)