11.09.2006, 18:59:46
(This post was last modified: 12.09.2006, 12:29:47 by Bobingabout.)
thanks for the info. 23 is missing, using the system of double+1, i take that to be 11? would be nice to re-arange to remove this pointless gap, but i supose a gap at 11 doesn't matter.
and the double+1 rules also concerns me that you have a 0, shouldn't that be a 1 instead? (0+0=0(double). 0+1=1(+1)). if it works, fair enough, but i recomend you fix this 1, even if you do not do anything else to it.
also 5 is there twice, is that to do with the observer? (translates to LightGrey AKA white. i remember PD saying something about this a long time ago) this forces you to either use white, or change the observer colour. i don't think that matters, but you might want to consider re-numbering things to leave a gap at colour 2 (5) LightGrey.
and the double+1 rules also concerns me that you have a 0, shouldn't that be a 1 instead? (0+0=0(double). 0+1=1(+1)). if it works, fair enough, but i recomend you fix this 1, even if you do not do anything else to it.
also 5 is there twice, is that to do with the observer? (translates to LightGrey AKA white. i remember PD saying something about this a long time ago) this forces you to either use white, or change the observer colour. i don't think that matters, but you might want to consider re-numbering things to leave a gap at colour 2 (5) LightGrey.