Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rock Patch 1.10 development thread
#76
CnCVK Wrote:no, TS don't use it too.
"...because I say so and if I say so it is that way. Period."

CnCVK Wrote:..something happen..
What is really happen?
Write about changes, not just some effect !
Well, last time I tried it, I quite clearly remember seeing varying AI activity (or lack thereof). If I interpreted Icy's post correctly, he, too, saw changes in behavior. Not to mention that DZ probably doesn't make stuff like that up.

But hey, what's personal experience, a reliable source, and no challenge from the community for six years against the all-knowing words of VK? I mean, come on...it's VK, of all people! That man is right by default, mmkay? It's just "VK says...", and it is. Period. Kinda like God creating Earth, but with less naked chicks and more code.

God this kid is arrogant. Rolling eyes

CnCVK Wrote:No. and at first you must prove it Smile
The edit was signed "-VK" and posted from the same IP address you used to make that post. That is proof enough.

And even if you want to act as retardedly stupid as DCoder predicts, that only proves that your machine is a security hazard to the server, reason enough to block it entirely from it, not only from ModEnc.

Hell, if you're such a coward that you don't even stand by the shit that you do, fine. Then don't admit it. Just stop it. But you're not gonna talk yourself out of this. It was unquestionably your machine doing the edits, and I hardly doubt someone as "supar smrt" as God of Code C&CVK would have his machine hacked and used as a ModEnc spambot, of all things.

btw, I'm not sure which it is, but you're either the stupidest or most arrogant person I've ever met in this community.
The "half hundred" thing was ridiculous already...but claiming you didn't edit ModEnc and we couldn't prove it, while we multiple times have a post coming from the same IP as the latest vandalism, is just...yeah...either totally stupid or totally arrogant.

...but it's not credible either way.
Forum Rules

(01.06.2011, 05:43:25)kenosis Wrote: Oh damn don't be disgraced again!

(25.06.2011, 20:42:59)Nighthawk Wrote: The proverbial bearded omni-bug may be dead, but the containment campaign is still being waged in the desert.


Messages In This Thread
Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 16.04.2007, 20:54:06
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 18.04.2007, 11:52:08
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 19.04.2007, 08:45:22
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 19.04.2007, 13:03:52
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 20.04.2007, 16:00:32
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 21.04.2007, 12:22:26
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 21.04.2007, 12:56:01
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 21.04.2007, 22:25:09
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Blade - 22.04.2007, 14:59:21
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 22.04.2007, 15:00:34
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 22.04.2007, 22:52:31
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by MadHQ - 23.04.2007, 07:14:42
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by MadHQ - 23.04.2007, 18:30:55
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 23.04.2007, 21:53:34
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by MadHQ - 24.04.2007, 03:30:43
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 24.04.2007, 08:17:36
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by MadHQ - 25.04.2007, 06:14:39
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Guest - 24.04.2007, 23:36:47
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 25.04.2007, 09:56:47
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Renegade - 25.04.2007, 15:25:46
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by MadHQ - 25.04.2007, 20:06:14
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Guest - 25.04.2007, 21:10:56
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 26.04.2007, 09:54:40
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 26.04.2007, 13:39:05
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by MadHQ - 26.04.2007, 23:23:46
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by MadHQ - 27.04.2007, 00:34:53
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by MadHQ - 27.04.2007, 06:35:28
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 27.04.2007, 10:56:24
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Guest - 27.04.2007, 11:30:05
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 27.04.2007, 13:30:58
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 27.04.2007, 16:16:30
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Djohe from PPM - 27.04.2007, 21:21:24
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by /-\G@/\/\ - 27.04.2007, 23:31:31
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 28.04.2007, 13:36:30
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by FS-21 - 28.04.2007, 16:38:34
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by FS-21 - 28.04.2007, 18:13:49
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 29.04.2007, 21:57:55
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Guest - 29.04.2007, 22:44:10
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 30.04.2007, 23:00:33
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Blade - 01.05.2007, 01:58:23
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 01.05.2007, 21:45:06
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 02.05.2007, 08:42:24
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 02.05.2007, 12:55:52
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by /-\G@M - 03.05.2007, 00:00:55
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Blade - 03.05.2007, 01:32:49
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 03.05.2007, 11:52:21
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 03.05.2007, 15:35:50
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 03.05.2007, 21:50:21
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by tmapm - 04.05.2007, 00:26:10
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 04.05.2007, 07:46:57
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by R=Peder - 05.05.2007, 00:06:31
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 05.05.2007, 11:43:43
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 05.05.2007, 22:00:01
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by tmapm - 06.05.2007, 08:09:42
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by /-\G@/\/\ - 08.05.2007, 18:53:01
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by /-\G@/\/\ - 09.05.2007, 17:50:50
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Marko - 12.05.2007, 19:45:15
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 15.05.2007, 07:46:47
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 15.05.2007, 13:39:48
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 18.05.2007, 19:08:38
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 19.05.2007, 08:40:04
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Guest - 20.05.2007, 01:44:36
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 20.05.2007, 22:04:05
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by ----------- - 20.05.2007, 23:26:00
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by modder666666 (guest) - 21.05.2007, 01:43:24
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 22.05.2007, 11:54:39
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 23.05.2007, 12:59:50
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Blade - 23.05.2007, 22:34:38
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 24.05.2007, 15:53:46
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Unknow... - 25.05.2007, 14:26:55
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Guest - 02.06.2007, 19:01:37
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by MCV - 03.06.2007, 21:02:15
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 04.06.2007, 21:38:17
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by Mike - 04.06.2007, 23:03:57
RE: Rock Patch 1.10 development thread - by VK - 06.06.2007, 18:57:57
[split] RPCE #0052 & RPCE74 #0106 - by Guest - 16.05.2007, 05:06:12



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)