Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 936 vs. 429, 718 vs. 717
#7
Fight 1

#936 is half-worthless for requesting something that already exists and then actually mentioning the existing functionality in the summary.
Only the weapons part would, potentially, have been interesting, but with High=, there's a kinda-sorta pre-existing logic for that as well, and it simply doesn't seem to be all that interesting to the community, neither in the request nor in this DFD.

Therefore, #936 must die.

Kill: #936
Support: #429

Fight 2

Oh look! The oh-so-exciting suggestion to enable slooooooooow buildups was actually a duplicate! Clearly more people want the nerve-wrecking excitement of slow-ass buildups!
Not just that, but the submitter of the duplicate actually commented on the original, before submitting the duplicate, making it a knowing, willful duplicate.
Oh the things you learn in DFDs...

In case you didn't extrapolate it from my tone, "slower buildups" is boring as shit and I have no interest in it. #718, on the other hand, is a clear, narrow, logical extension of existing functionality, and all posters in this fight want it.

The choice is clear.

Kill: #717
Support: #718


Since Alex voted the same, this is the result.
Forum Rules

(01.06.2011, 05:43:25)kenosis Wrote: Oh damn don't be disgraced again!

(25.06.2011, 20:42:59)Nighthawk Wrote: The proverbial bearded omni-bug may be dead, but the containment campaign is still being waged in the desert.


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 936 vs. 429, 718 vs. 717 - by Renegade - 22.07.2010, 20:29:36
RE: DFD: 936 vs. 429, 718 vs. 717 - by reaperrr - 23.07.2010, 00:25:39
RE: DFD: 936 vs. 429, 718 vs. 717 - by Beowulf - 23.07.2010, 02:56:32
RE: DFD: 936 vs. 429, 718 vs. 717 - by MRMIdAS - 23.07.2010, 22:48:42
RE: DFD: 936 vs. 429, 718 vs. 717 - by Renegade - 27.07.2010, 02:54:13
RE: DFD: 936 vs. 429, 718 vs. 717 - by AlexB - 29.07.2010, 01:24:12
RE: DFD: 936 vs. 429, 718 vs. 717 - by Renegade - 06.08.2010, 02:03:19



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)