Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978
#4

Administrative Notice:

#668 is a tracking bug of mine and shouldn't have appeared here. Blame the automation. In accordance with the rules, it was disqualified and #948 survives by default.
Forum Rules

(01.06.2011, 05:43:25)kenosis Wrote: Oh damn don't be disgraced again!

(25.06.2011, 20:42:59)Nighthawk Wrote: The proverbial bearded omni-bug may be dead, but the containment campaign is still being waged in the desert.


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by Renegade - 22.07.2010, 20:27:02
RE: DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by Beowulf - 23.07.2010, 02:06:49
RE: DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by Blade - 23.07.2010, 12:50:54
RE: DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by Renegade - 23.07.2010, 02:35:11
RE: DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by MRMIdAS - 23.07.2010, 20:57:41
RE: DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by Nighthawk - 24.07.2010, 02:29:51
RE: DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by AlphaBravo - 26.07.2010, 01:52:36
RE: DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by Renegade - 28.07.2010, 23:23:02
RE: DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by Renegade - 06.08.2010, 03:25:56
RE: DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by AlexB - 06.08.2010, 05:59:03
RE: DFD: 668 vs. 948, 729 vs. 978 - by Renegade - 06.08.2010, 07:01:14



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)