Rock Patch 1.10 development thread

[Blade]

Arrgh, everyone thinks it needs to be one way or the other. As it stands, the current version of the versions page seems to be quite accurate and reflects the community knowledge and understanding of the rock patch versions. Its a wiki and Ren is correct, VK doesn't get to dictate the style of the page, he's providing raw information, he isn't the editor that gives final go ahead to the article as it is published. Originally, the page that Ren posted was IMO a big dig at VK due to Rens difference of opinion on how the RP should be developed and VK responded in kind. However that is no longer the case and the page as it stands should be IMO acceptable to both parties as the final word on the RP versions. I would personally like to know exactly what VK finds objectionable about the current version, it points out (accurately) that VK's naming system is idiosyncratic and while VK might not like that being spelled out in an official page, it is community consensus and that is what a wiki is supposed to be.

It might seem like I'm trying to play both sides here, but only because both sides have a point and both sides need to learn to compromise. The page as it stands IMO IS the compromise that everyone need to accept in order to move on.