Rock Patch 1.10 development thread

[blackheartstar]

But pretending I won't let anything stand that he wrote is just plain slander on your own part. Check RockPatch:Status, for example - of the fifty latest revisions, there is one by me. You know what that one does? Revert vandalism back to VK's version.

Then why edit the entire page or make it a redirect rather than just the slanderous parts? After all that was your advice to him when your origenal page was up. Im not pretending its a fact. If its not why wont you let him make his as he wants?  Im not questioning the removal of his off comments about pd or yourself as they shouldnt have been there, but thats where the editing should have stopped.

You should really get in your head that, independent from whether or not I like VK's page, I'm also generally administrating ModEnc - and part of that is protecting it from vandals and improving existing pages. What I did was ban a vandal, merge two similar pages, remove slander, and improve the design of a page.
Had I done that to any other page, you couldn't care less. But noooo, it was the versions page, so it must be a hostile attempt to suppress VK.

God. And they laugh about 9/11 conspiracy theories...

I understand very well that you run the this site. Im just questioning your methods of handling a creator who has a different point of view than your own. Where you can consider the editing/deleting of the aigenerals section and iscanine section vandalizing becouse he wont properly explain or prove these things. The editing of the versions page really is his place to edit. If he changed something on pds release order I could see that as vandaless but on what he has put out for the patch it is a product he is currently working on not yours not mine and should be able list his work as he pleases.

Oh, yeah, right...when I'm "misleading" people by giving them real version numbers as guidelines, that's bad.
But when he's misleading people by listing only pd's bugfix-versions and badmouthing only his versions, that's totally fine and not to worry about.

God you're such a hypocrite, it's disgusting.

No your missleading through comments like this. I never said it was bad its just not how he wants his work on this project protraied or listed. You do dictate over what he displays hence his old page became a redirect to you merged page, and you said by posting anything else he was asking for another merge or did you forget you said this:

All you're setting up is another merge.

You may not like it but he wants his work presented in away you dont seem to like or understand so you dont let it happen. You are the hypocrite here. Saying you dont stop him then turning around and reorganizing what he put up into your view rather than his. Explain where I was being a hypocrite here please?

If your going to try this as its the last thing said in that paragraph

But when he's misleading people by listing only pd's bugfix-versions and badmouthing only his versions, that's totally fine and not to worry about.

God you're such a hypocrite, it's disgusting.

Re read the post your quoting me from youll find I said this

Ofcourse if he puts it up with slander you can just go edit out said slander without mergeing or changeing anything else.

I have never condoned the pointless degredations thrown around by VK, and still do not. Did you over look that or just ignore it?

Forcing him to do what? Make his page not look like crap? Not slandering pd? Not leaving out information?

Oh, forgive me for trying to have ModEnc display accurate information.?

Forceing him to go with your version of the versions page. You do not accept anything else.

Why would I not merge the pages? The current page shows, matter-of-factly, VK's versioning, and below it, clearly marked at not official, a logical mapping of that versioning to traditional numbers.
What would be the advantage of having this information separate?
What would be the advantage of leaving out VK's revisions?
What would be the advantage of taking out all the release dates, hierarchy and revision notes, and returning to a plain list format.

You can try and play the supporter all you want - there is no logical reason, no advantage of his design over mine or a two-page solution.
He's just crying because my page is better designed as his, and I dared to show that.?

No he crys becouse you consistantly rework his page rather than let it be. On things like the slander and down play of pd I agree change it as it has no place there. You dont stop there though you go the next step and start editing his view of the release info. He obiously doesnt want the fix revisions listed you insist that they be creating two completely different pages. It dosent matter if its logical or not.

Yeah right...ignore everything I replied and keep pretending I'm suppressing him. At least you're consistent.

You are every single time you reword rework or threaten to merge his page you are infact suppressing him. Such as you are the hypocrit here. (and when I say reword Im not reffering to the senceless bad comments he makes)

An impostor, yes, but a consistent one.

I dont see how I am a "imposter".

I want VK to stop being childish about this and ignore your opinion thus continue work on the patch. Id also like to see him learn better way to discribe things so everything he has to say doesnt come out as a derogatory attack . I want you to stop being so insistant that your view is the onlyone that works and to see that his view may just be valid even if hes the only one thats sees it and its not logical. Those are the goals of my comments.