Rock Patch 1.10 development thread

[VK]

I mean, come on...if he knows there were such problems in the past, why would he

do it better? If we've done it once, why shouldn't we do it again?

You start to accuse me, althought PD did the same things
(Spyplane -> SpyPlane, SpecialColor, SpyPlane on [General], Dom tags and another)

Well, it might just be the fact that you just posted under the same IP from
which the latest vandalization came...or the fact that it did exactly the same changes
as the ones you signed with "-the VK"...or Apache's logs showing your IP accessing

ModEnc's editing pages...
Or maybe just the fact that you just admitted to editing the pages...

This don't prove anything at all.

you want me to delete that page anyway...

I want that this page contain my official text.

So wait...you ridicule pd for carefully crafting his releases, while you need a

dozen revisions to get it half-way stable, because (as you just publically admitted)

you don't do anything more than basic tests?

However I don't want to offend PD in any way, although his code sometimes isn't good.
Look into RP 1.08. It was released by PD three times! and the result?
Totally shit - error on load screen!
Where "basic tests" here?

You shouldn't compare my releasing style with PD's style.
I write again: you can still use old style - simple ignore all revisions until next RP comes.

I always test only basic things; I assume that other bugs will be found by community.

you see here anything fun?

I always test only basic things; I assume that other bugs will be found by community.

Yes, community: Because a change over three versions (five releases) is absolutely equal to a sudden change within revisions of the same version. Didn't you know? So what, "your release was CE compatible"? Now it's not anymore! Quit whining, update already.

again: this the first version which really use revisions, so I can have errors.

It's the filename used on the official download server, so it represents that version of RP.

I am sorry, I thought that people go to RP home page and see last release and press download link.
Now I will use:
RP_<version>_<revision number>.exe format.

But as I noted above, things like Windows only get released once every few years. You know Vista is newer than XP, even without the numbers, because XP has been around for five years or something, while Vista was just released three months ago.

also Delphi: Delphi 6, Delphi 7, Delphi 8, Delphi 2005, Delphi 2006
also Intel: Pentium, Pentium 2, Pentium 3, Pentium 4, Pentium D, Core Duoand others.

Without version numbers, that's not easily possible.

my page allow do it very simple.