Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429
#7
[349] gets my vote, it's feature everyone wants, and will allow more strategy in YR.

[765] is a feature that is OK as outlined in the bugtracker, but I think would make more sense if the opentopped logic were extended to allow buildings too, this may even solve the issue of garrisonned troops having one fixed range.
[Image: MRMIdAS2k.jpg]
MRMIdAS: No longer allowed to criticise Westwood on PPM


Messages In This Thread
DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by Renegade - 11.08.2010, 01:42:28
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by mt. - 11.08.2010, 03:46:48
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by Speeder - 11.08.2010, 19:18:43
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by eva-251 - 11.08.2010, 19:48:50
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by MRMIdAS - 11.08.2010, 19:58:33
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by Beowulf - 11.08.2010, 21:57:50
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by AlexB - 03.10.2010, 01:21:33
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by DCoder - 03.10.2010, 20:37:19



Users browsing this thread: