reaperrr
29.07.2010, 17:27:08
Fight 1:
Support #1074
Kill #1099
Being able to form and break alliances with AIs like in RA1 sounds overall more interesting than re-enabling the LightningRod, as the latter has a very limited usage scenario.
Fight 2:
As this is my issue, my vote cleary goes to support #1068.
It's simply unrealistic that a straight-shooter like a prism tank can fire over a battle fortress hitting a terror drone behind it.
For other usage scenarios and advantages this feature would bring, simply read the description and additional info.
And I don't like temporary bonuses in games in general, so kill #1147.
Support #1074
Kill #1099
Being able to form and break alliances with AIs like in RA1 sounds overall more interesting than re-enabling the LightningRod, as the latter has a very limited usage scenario.
Fight 2:
(29.07.2010, 00:46:13)MRMIdAS Wrote: and i'm struggling to envisage how subject to [TYPE] is any different from verses=0%uh... then you should re-read the description and comments (assuming you have read them...)
As this is my issue, my vote cleary goes to support #1068.
It's simply unrealistic that a straight-shooter like a prism tank can fire over a battle fortress hitting a terror drone behind it.
For other usage scenarios and advantages this feature would bring, simply read the description and additional info.
And I don't like temporary bonuses in games in general, so kill #1147.