AlexB
06.08.2010, 06:13:27
Fight 2
Most post argue that infantry shouldn't be able to traverse cliffs, but the issue isn't about infantry and it isn't about cliffs either. The requester corrected himself to slopes. And indeed, SHP tanks look weird on slopes and the issue requests to use different images when a tank climbs a slope.
Changing looks depending on passengers/captured units would look cool indeed and glowing Psychic towers would easily be differenciated from towers that still have full capacity. But who wants to create ten voxels to add one little soldier in the back of a truck to show how many passengers it has?
Both are good issues and both should get implemented, but not to full extend as both can be misused way beyond reason. For now, I vote for the misunderstood Slope SHP sequence.
Most post argue that infantry shouldn't be able to traverse cliffs, but the issue isn't about infantry and it isn't about cliffs either. The requester corrected himself to slopes. And indeed, SHP tanks look weird on slopes and the issue requests to use different images when a tank climbs a slope.
Changing looks depending on passengers/captured units would look cool indeed and glowing Psychic towers would easily be differenciated from towers that still have full capacity. But who wants to create ten voxels to add one little soldier in the back of a truck to show how many passengers it has?
Both are good issues and both should get implemented, but not to full extend as both can be misused way beyond reason. For now, I vote for the misunderstood Slope SHP sequence.