DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212

Thread Closed

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212

Black Shadow 750
Member

Posts:

112

Threads:

Joined:

16 Jul 2007

Reputation:

20.07.2010, 14:23:37

I support 1020 purely because the opposing request is stupid. Pray tell how a moving unit/infantry is going to be hooked up to the power grid? It would make sense had localized power gone through but as is it's down right stupid. You want something to deploy into a mobile power plant (example used in issue)? Then make it deploy into a building.

I choose 212 purely because the AI could do with some improvements.

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Thread Closed

Messages In This Thread

DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by AlexB - 20.07.2010, 06:24:20

RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by jimmy3421 - 20.07.2010, 06:43:03

RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Black Shadow 750 - 20.07.2010, 14:23:37

RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Blade - 20.07.2010, 15:34:17

RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by MRMIdAS - 20.07.2010, 16:46:22

RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Darkstorm - 20.07.2010, 20:07:38

RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Blade - 20.07.2010, 23:19:33

RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Beowulf - 21.07.2010, 07:54:52