Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 943 vs. 689, 518 vs. 927
#3
#689 was more of what I was arguing for in the deploy issue. This is what I really wanted and would allow the aforementioned 'transformer' units.
#943 is lame and would only be useful in such a "wait, what the hell?" raising scenario as to be useless to any decent mod.

#518 would silence all requests from me for aircraft to be able to guard area as I could just set them up on a patrol loop and save everyone time.

#927 (as previously stated) is redundant in the face of "upgrade upgrade" from the earlier DFD


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 943 vs. 689, 518 vs. 927 - by Renegade - 11.07.2010, 20:32:50
RE: DFD: 943 vs. 689, 518 vs. 927 - by Lt Albrecht - 11.07.2010, 21:14:39
RE: DFD: 943 vs. 689, 518 vs. 927 - by Beowulf - 11.07.2010, 21:59:03
RE: DFD: 943 vs. 689, 518 vs. 927 - by MRMIdAS - 11.07.2010, 22:31:37
RE: DFD: 943 vs. 689, 518 vs. 927 - by Deformat - 12.07.2010, 13:10:00
RE: DFD: 943 vs. 689, 518 vs. 927 - by WoRmINaToR - 12.07.2010, 22:13:05
RE: DFD: 943 vs. 689, 518 vs. 927 - by Renegade - 13.07.2010, 23:37:07
RE: DFD: 943 vs. 689, 518 vs. 927 - by AlexB - 14.07.2010, 00:48:53
RE: DFD: 943 vs. 689, 518 vs. 927 - by Renegade - 14.07.2010, 19:46:00



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)