Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 292 vs. 928, 525 vs. 242
#5
Kill #928. The premise is just ridiculous at best and #292 is a hell of a lot more useful. I won't use it myself, but deformable terrain is a nice idea for that eyecandy.

Kill #525. It seems like a lot of work with not enough benefit. Stealth units are really lame in YR and this would probably make it worse. As such, I support #242. Plane extension is a hell of a lot better than stealth.

Condensed version:
Kill #928 and #525.
Support #292 and #242.
I'm what Willis was talkin' about.


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 292 vs. 928, 525 vs. 242 - by Renegade - 11.07.2010, 20:31:46
RE: DFD: 292 vs. 928, 525 vs. 242 - by reaperrr - 11.07.2010, 21:24:06
RE: DFD: 292 vs. 928, 525 vs. 242 - by Beowulf - 11.07.2010, 22:05:03
RE: DFD: 292 vs. 928, 525 vs. 242 - by MRMIdAS - 11.07.2010, 22:28:06
RE: DFD: 292 vs. 928, 525 vs. 242 - by Blade - 12.07.2010, 00:08:52
RE: DFD: 292 vs. 928, 525 vs. 242 - by Deformat - 12.07.2010, 13:02:03
RE: DFD: 292 vs. 928, 525 vs. 242 - by AlexB - 12.07.2010, 20:30:15
RE: DFD: 292 vs. 928, 525 vs. 242 - by DCoder - 13.07.2010, 06:27:47
RE: DFD: 292 vs. 928, 525 vs. 242 - by Renegade - 13.07.2010, 17:37:26



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)