Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 924 vs. 999, 685 vs. 725
#9
(24.07.2010, 01:14:13)Nighthawk200 Wrote: Hmm, four meh-ish issues where I'm concerned, but oh well, here goes.

For fight one:
I'm a little confused about this EMP Temporal weapon. It sounds like it's basically the same thing as EMP, except with a transparency effect on the target. Wouldn't some sort of warhead tag to cause transparency combined with regular EMP work just as well?

As for the second issue, I like the sound of a super weapon turning its host structure into something else - could make for some interesting ideas if people want to go down the whole "epic unit" route. However, I wouldn't see it getting as much use as this EMP temporal stuff.

So while I personally prefer the super weapon idea, because I like new super weapon technologies, logic tells me to support the EMP temporal issue. Ergo, support #924, kill #999.

No. The "EMP-Like Temporal" is essentially a Temporal weapon except it's not linked. So you can use Temporals with CellSpread weapons.


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 924 vs. 999, 685 vs. 725 - by Renegade - 22.07.2010, 20:24:16
RE: DFD: 924 vs. 999, 685 vs. 725 - by Blade - 23.07.2010, 00:28:16
RE: DFD: 924 vs. 999, 685 vs. 725 - by Beowulf - 23.07.2010, 02:59:02
RE: DFD: 924 vs. 999, 685 vs. 725 - by Drogan - 23.07.2010, 15:06:44
RE: DFD: 924 vs. 999, 685 vs. 725 - by Blade - 23.07.2010, 15:25:48
RE: DFD: 924 vs. 999, 685 vs. 725 - by WoRmINaToR - 23.07.2010, 19:37:34
RE: DFD: 924 vs. 999, 685 vs. 725 - by MRMIdAS - 23.07.2010, 20:35:14
RE: DFD: 924 vs. 999, 685 vs. 725 - by Nighthawk - 24.07.2010, 01:14:13
RE: DFD: 924 vs. 999, 685 vs. 725 - by AlphaBravo - 25.07.2010, 11:56:53
RE: DFD: 924 vs. 999, 685 vs. 725 - by Renegade - 28.07.2010, 23:21:38
RE: DFD: 924 vs. 999, 685 vs. 725 - by AlexB - 04.08.2010, 18:30:58
RE: DFD: 924 vs. 999, 685 vs. 725 - by Renegade - 05.08.2010, 20:26:14



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)