Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 991 vs. 332, 588 vs. 328
#13
I shouldn't need to make clones and clutter my rules file when I have a perfectly good superweapon and structure already waiting.

Quote:If thats the case, how do you know which "copy" is ready to fire and how much the others have to charge in RA2's limited UI?
I would imagine that when an icon says "Ready" that would be a big clue. Maybe it's just me, but I would have assumed that to be FUCKING obvious.

Quote:I support #991 because more generals style logic is a bad thing and we need less of it.
No, we DO need more of it. RA2's simplicity is perfect, but the lack of ability to do some things Generals does (not just stackable superweapons) is kinda... weak. There is more to Generals that stackable superweapons you know, but I bet you don't. Have you even played Generals and Zero Hour?

Quote:Sorry if this comes across as a bit immature Beowulf, but your "argument" for supporting #991 comes across as "I want RA2 to be more like generals, waa waa" rather than any particular discussion on the merits of the features. Tibtrees making different types of ore/tiberium is IMO a restored TS feature and has a lot of support from people wanting to make TS based mods.
But... what are you really restoring? Right, not a fucking thing. The only thing to 'restore' is the [BIGBLUE] from Tiberian Sun to spawn gems. Fuck that, reduces the value of gems. I don't really see the point for "expanding ore types." It feels like a worthless venture.
I'm what Willis was talkin' about.


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 991 vs. 332, 588 vs. 328 - by AlexB - 20.07.2010, 21:22:14
RE: DFD: 991 vs. 332, 588 vs. 328 - by MRMIdAS - 21.07.2010, 04:57:49
RE: DFD: 991 vs. 332, 588 vs. 328 - by Darkstorm - 21.07.2010, 05:00:27
RE: DFD: 991 vs. 332, 588 vs. 328 - by MRMIdAS - 21.07.2010, 05:05:07
RE: DFD: 991 vs. 332, 588 vs. 328 - by eva-251 - 21.07.2010, 05:48:12
RE: DFD: 991 vs. 332, 588 vs. 328 - by Beowulf - 21.07.2010, 08:02:52
RE: DFD: 991 vs. 332, 588 vs. 328 - by Darkstorm - 21.07.2010, 09:47:21
RE: DFD: 991 vs. 332, 588 vs. 328 - by Blade - 21.07.2010, 10:18:18
RE: DFD: 991 vs. 332, 588 vs. 328 - by Beowulf - 21.07.2010, 19:13:27
RE: DFD: 991 vs. 332, 588 vs. 328 - by Marshall - 21.07.2010, 19:14:10
RE: DFD: 991 vs. 332, 588 vs. 328 - by Blade - 21.07.2010, 23:13:44
RE: DFD: 991 vs. 332, 588 vs. 328 - by WoRmINaToR - 22.07.2010, 02:59:32
RE: DFD: 991 vs. 332, 588 vs. 328 - by Darkstorm - 22.07.2010, 07:23:33
RE: DFD: 991 vs. 332, 588 vs. 328 - by Marshall - 22.07.2010, 13:50:02
RE: DFD: 991 vs. 332, 588 vs. 328 - by Striker - 22.07.2010, 14:57:45
RE: DFD: 991 vs. 332, 588 vs. 328 - by Darkstorm - 22.07.2010, 19:33:21
RE: DFD: 991 vs. 332, 588 vs. 328 - by Renegade - 23.07.2010, 01:36:43
RE: DFD: 991 vs. 332, 588 vs. 328 - by AlexB - 07.08.2010, 15:27:34
RE: DFD: 991 vs. 332, 588 vs. 328 - by Renegade - 08.08.2010, 07:51:51



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)