Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 372 vs. 333, 586 vs. 324
#7
Fight 1

Both issues seem trivial to me, but waypoint mode for aircraft is already included. This means that the extended waypoint control has a much more limited use.

Issue 1: Again, limited in use due to aircraft way points.

Issue 2: This is just allowing the use of barrel pitching without the turret spinning.

Support: [0000333] Barrel=
Kill: [0000372] Have tags controling the ability to use waypoints and attack move


Fight 2

Issue 1: Now I can understand this coming in handy in some cases, but I see EVA events as contrary to the whole RTS thing. While attack and detection I can see as needed, creation and deploying are not really. Battlefield Awareness needs an important factor in RTS, this includes proper scouting of the battlefield and knowing what you enemy is doing. If they build or deploy a strong unit without you knowing, it should be pinned on your head. Creation event can get away since you can't keep an eye on your enemy's base all the time, but if they deploy something powerful, usually next to your base or units, to attack you, you should really know about it. So this, while optional, needs little attention in my opinion. But remember, this is all my way of looking at it.

Issue 2: This is just saying don't make elite units that have their unit type changed into that unit and retain their status. Which I think warrants more attention that the above issue.

Support: [0000324] Thought on UpgradeSystem
Kill: [0000586] EVA Alert (Like CreateSound) On Unit Deploy
[Image: darkstormsmall.png]


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 372 vs. 333, 586 vs. 324 - by AlexB - 17.07.2010, 16:11:35
RE: DFD: 372 vs. 333, 586 vs. 324 - by Striker - 17.07.2010, 16:46:04
RE: DFD: 372 vs. 333, 586 vs. 324 - by Blade - 17.07.2010, 18:06:27
RE: DFD: 372 vs. 333, 586 vs. 324 - by MRMIdAS - 17.07.2010, 18:11:14
RE: DFD: 372 vs. 333, 586 vs. 324 - by Beowulf - 17.07.2010, 23:34:26
RE: DFD: 372 vs. 333, 586 vs. 324 - by Darkstorm - 18.07.2010, 00:32:21
RE: DFD: 372 vs. 333, 586 vs. 324 - by Renegade - 18.07.2010, 22:24:16
RE: DFD: 372 vs. 333, 586 vs. 324 - by AlexB - 18.07.2010, 23:37:53
RE: DFD: 372 vs. 333, 586 vs. 324 - by Renegade - 27.07.2010, 03:00:25



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)