Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 943 vs. 689, 518 vs. 927
#10
Definitely support #689 over #943. While 943 would be kind of cool and would be a fun tactical addition, it would probably be rarely used and it's far less important than *types being able to transform into other *types. As said before, this would allow great amounts of possibility in creating EotRS units in a RA3 TC mod, and futuristic mods will gobble this feature up. Buildable land bridges will most likely end up changing the outcomes of less games than transforming units will.

And as said at least 5 times above 927 is redundant, so support 518. Aircraft being able to follow waypoints and patrol loops would be incredible, however I am not sure how much improvement on general aircraft movement logic would be necessary. For instance, one problem that would need tackling is the aircrafts' complete inability to acquire its own targets.

Nonetheless, it's still more useful than a redundant issue, and it's an issue I support all the way.


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 943 vs. 689, 518 vs. 927 - by Renegade - 11.07.2010, 20:32:50
RE: DFD: 943 vs. 689, 518 vs. 927 - by Beowulf - 11.07.2010, 21:59:03
RE: DFD: 943 vs. 689, 518 vs. 927 - by MRMIdAS - 11.07.2010, 22:31:37
RE: DFD: 943 vs. 689, 518 vs. 927 - by Deformat - 12.07.2010, 13:10:00
RE: DFD: 943 vs. 689, 518 vs. 927 - by WoRmINaToR - 12.07.2010, 22:13:05
RE: DFD: 943 vs. 689, 518 vs. 927 - by Renegade - 13.07.2010, 23:37:07
RE: DFD: 943 vs. 689, 518 vs. 927 - by AlexB - 14.07.2010, 00:48:53
RE: DFD: 943 vs. 689, 518 vs. 927 - by Renegade - 14.07.2010, 19:46:00



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)