Rock Patch 1.10 development thread

[VK]

Did not. pd not release 14 versions in rapid succession which were all officially incompatible to each other. He also didn't rename stuff just for fun. pd tried to maintain compatibility as long as possible, and only broke it if it was impossible to maintain it. Unlike you, who just decided compatibility sucks, and declared everything incompatible.

sometimes you should break compatibility.
However, all my "renames" have a really reasons.
but PD's: "Change: Spyplane and SpyplanesNum are now SpyPlane and SpyPlanesNum"
have any reason?

As long as you stick to it.
But that doesn't change the fact that
RP_Summer_Edition_0050.exe
RP_Celebration_Edition_0050.exe
RP_Hells_Edition_0050.exe
still doesn't tell the user which one is the latest.

I find a good soulution:
Create OLD subfoler and move here all non-current RP version files.

Thanks for the insight on your future planned version names, though

this only preview.

Oooh...it still had bugs after three releases...how often, again, did you release CE?

As I see, you really think, that this is really easy, isn't it?  

Anyways... Are we gonna see drop pods back into RP?

Now development of RP 1.10 is stopped.
Maybe, I will return it in the next version.

First off, it's not an official page, as has been stated several times, so therefore does not have to reflect official information.

I create a official page RockPatch:VKVersions and did you see that King Ren do?
He simple don't allow me to create official page.
Again I talk this:
King Ren allow on ModEnc only things, which he likes or good in his opinion.
I am not first who said this however.
For example, look into AIGenerals. I had proved that this is totally bullshit.
No! King Ren, who know nothing about COM, don't think so.
He can't prove it and change it back.
...and a lot of another tags.

I coded Drop pods when it was first released then just yesterday i got around to testing it... and once the pods showed up and IE poped up... so thats when i went looking to see if i messed up codeing, but couldn't find anything... Then asked some
one and they said VK removed it because it didn't work and he didn't want to fix it.

It have no changes. I only delete it from help and write "unsupported".  

We've tried to persuade him, no results.

As I see, you forgot who is you, isn't?
Did you know assembler for x86? yes?
Did you know windows kernel system? yes?
Did you have any hacking experience? Yes?
I think: No (it's my suggestion however).
So never think about things which you really don't know at all.
main ideas:
1)Coders of patch don't need any demands.
2)NOT ALL things can be done! (in real time)
3)NOT ALL bugs can be fixed! (in real time)