blackheartstar
21.04.2007, 16:22:55
(This post was last modified: 21.04.2007, 18:39:46 by blackheartstar.)
The way I see it the VKs revisions are no different from saying 1.05a, 1.05b, or 1.05c. They do not constitute a full version change. I know your argument for this is that he changed things that you consider new version worthy but he didnt.
He didnt but lets say he listed everything he had planned to accomplish with CE, and now everything appears to be working satisfactory. Since he listed his goals (once agian I know he didnt) of CE and now at the end of development they are done would you still insist that these changes you think are all so new version worth need new versions or do you let him call it CE?
Look at this thread for example he listed the main things he hoped to do in 1.10. Im sure (well up to this big fuss anyway) that we would see 1.10 revision #12, 1.10 revision #22, 1.10 revision #97. He will probably change a great many things not on that list, and also change things on his quest to complete 1.10 that are large and or major to the game. Does that mean where all this work is in the name of 1.10 on your list youer going to have it spand 3 different versions?
Rockpatch isnt the only place where odd number/name systems systems pop up. Out side of the Windows example Decoder brought up Castlevania after 1,2,3 only uses names where Final Fantasy games use numbers if even in the case of X where X-2 used two sets, but all of the new Final Fantasy VII endevors are names with no numbers (Advent Children/Dirge of Cerberus/Before Crisis/Crisis Core). Megaman 1-8 along side Megaman X-1-3 but X isnt ten. Mario 1,2,3,World,64,Sunshine this could go on and on. Yet nobody has a problem keeping up.
VK why is Rockpatch 1.10 still paused? If it really is RENs opinion on versioning thats bothering you to the point of pausing argue with or ignore him, but dont take it out on us the end users who really could careless about name/number structure.
He didnt but lets say he listed everything he had planned to accomplish with CE, and now everything appears to be working satisfactory. Since he listed his goals (once agian I know he didnt) of CE and now at the end of development they are done would you still insist that these changes you think are all so new version worth need new versions or do you let him call it CE?
Look at this thread for example he listed the main things he hoped to do in 1.10. Im sure (well up to this big fuss anyway) that we would see 1.10 revision #12, 1.10 revision #22, 1.10 revision #97. He will probably change a great many things not on that list, and also change things on his quest to complete 1.10 that are large and or major to the game. Does that mean where all this work is in the name of 1.10 on your list youer going to have it spand 3 different versions?
Rockpatch isnt the only place where odd number/name systems systems pop up. Out side of the Windows example Decoder brought up Castlevania after 1,2,3 only uses names where Final Fantasy games use numbers if even in the case of X where X-2 used two sets, but all of the new Final Fantasy VII endevors are names with no numbers (Advent Children/Dirge of Cerberus/Before Crisis/Crisis Core). Megaman 1-8 along side Megaman X-1-3 but X isnt ten. Mario 1,2,3,World,64,Sunshine this could go on and on. Yet nobody has a problem keeping up.
VK why is Rockpatch 1.10 still paused? If it really is RENs opinion on versioning thats bothering you to the point of pausing argue with or ignore him, but dont take it out on us the end users who really could careless about name/number structure.