CnCVK Wrote:Please use XXYYYYZHow long has RockPatch being going to bring us up to 1.08b (or SE as you say)?
example: 01 0009 1 = Rock Patch 1.09 SE
At the current rate of version progress we're still looking at 10 years even if ZZ is always 00, before hitting version 2.0.
Also, how am I supposed to get "SE" from "1", or whatever other version names you use in future?
pd Wrote:why don't you simply stick to that XYYZZ format?I must agree with pd on this. The old format (which is being used for the TX too) is so much easier. And with LB Mod Creator, mod authors need to be able to understand this build number if they want RockPAtch to be a prerequisite of their mod.
it's easier for everybody!
I envisage the following:
10900 = 1.09
10901 = 1.09a (instead of SE)
10902 = 1.09b (instead of SE revision #1234)
10926 = 1.09z (instead of SE revision #34509736502)
I think it's just so much easier sticking to XYYZZ (remember X can be anything, such that 123456726 = 12345.67z
CnCVK Wrote:Changes in Rock Patch multi-language system:Okay, I can make the program understand that. However, what if you need to add language specific graphics in future? In that case I would have to rewrite the program. Would it not be helpful to future proof and just have the mix files? (the program will handle file patching so you won't be getting a huge file bloat - only the changes are actually bundled). Let me know how you want to proceed!
I will create only English version of ROCKPATCH.MIX; for another languages, RP.CSF in YR directory will be overwritten to built-in english RP.CSF
Ever wondered what the hell is going on?
Believe me friend you're not the only one.
--Lysdexia
Check out Launch Base for RA2/YR - http://marshall.strategy-x.com
Also home to the Purple Alert mod, 1.002 UMP, and the YR Playlist Manager.
Believe me friend you're not the only one.
--Lysdexia
Check out Launch Base for RA2/YR - http://marshall.strategy-x.com
Also home to the Purple Alert mod, 1.002 UMP, and the YR Playlist Manager.