Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD-R3: 518 vs. 1115, 730 vs. 564
#7
Support #518. While #1115 is a great idea, aircraft extension is far better in terms of improving their usability and the gameplay.

Kill #564. FAKE IT. #730 is restoring removed Tiberian Sun logic, which was stupidly removed. I like it a hell of a lot more than 'using a different side in mission progression.' Because really, how many people will actually make use of it? I surmise that more people will use #730 since it's easier to implement and more fucking useful.
I'm what Willis was talkin' about.


Messages In This Thread
DFD-R3: 518 vs. 1115, 730 vs. 564 - by Renegade - 11.08.2010, 01:49:08
RE: DFD-R3: 518 vs. 1115, 730 vs. 564 - by Blade - 11.08.2010, 13:55:30
RE: DFD-R3: 518 vs. 1115, 730 vs. 564 - by Beowulf - 11.08.2010, 22:39:39
RE: DFD-R3: 518 vs. 1115, 730 vs. 564 - by Blade - 12.08.2010, 00:31:17
RE: DFD-R3: 518 vs. 1115, 730 vs. 564 - by mt. - 12.08.2010, 20:33:29
RE: DFD-R3: 518 vs. 1115, 730 vs. 564 - by AlexB - 21.08.2010, 09:23:06



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)