Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD-R3: 461 vs. 924, 943 vs. 612
#8
Support #461. Rather see a hold fire command over another Temporal/EMP-like superweapon. Hold fire gives better support for stealth units and allows better ambush tactics and strategies.

Support #612. The AI will benefit everyone, not a minor subset of people. #943 is a bit too gimmicky for my taste, but #612 is something the AI really, really, REALLY needs. Let's benefit the AI before a gimmick rolls in.
I'm what Willis was talkin' about.


Messages In This Thread
DFD-R3: 461 vs. 924, 943 vs. 612 - by Renegade - 11.08.2010, 01:39:06
RE: DFD-R3: 461 vs. 924, 943 vs. 612 - by mt. - 11.08.2010, 03:58:51
RE: DFD-R3: 461 vs. 924, 943 vs. 612 - by eva-251 - 11.08.2010, 09:01:07
RE: DFD-R3: 461 vs. 924, 943 vs. 612 - by Blade - 11.08.2010, 13:02:28
RE: DFD-R3: 461 vs. 924, 943 vs. 612 - by Speeder - 11.08.2010, 19:23:49
RE: DFD-R3: 461 vs. 924, 943 vs. 612 - by MRMIdAS - 11.08.2010, 20:09:15
RE: DFD-R3: 461 vs. 924, 943 vs. 612 - by Beowulf - 11.08.2010, 22:10:22
RE: DFD-R3: 461 vs. 924, 943 vs. 612 - by DCoder - 18.08.2010, 18:21:44



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)