Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 511 vs. 625, 373 vs. 349
#5
*screams mad scientist-esque cliches about his creation having gained life*
Out of all 4 of these I'd really much prefer 373 & 349 over any other combination.
Reasoning:
349: Tanks have guard mode and their targets are usually slow and easy to click (and for those that aren't they have auto-acquire), planes don't have either and their prospective targets can be fast and hard to click or numerous (e.g other planes or tank swarms) for buildings they have no problems but that's 1/4 of techtypes...
373: Everyone loves gunships, I bet they'd love them more if they worked properly...

I'm not even going to offer an argument or opinion for fight one, it's completely dead wood and useless. Almost all of it.

Can't we just have these as a 4 way FFA Ren? I mean what's the point of euthanising a good issue and taking forwards a bad one when they're both in the same thread and all.Also, it'd be in the finest traditions of RA2, if the thread is our 'map' and the issues our 'players', they won't sit there and just fight their 1 opponent...


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 511 vs. 625, 373 vs. 349 - by Renegade - 22.07.2010, 20:30:01
RE: DFD: 511 vs. 625, 373 vs. 349 - by reaperrr - 23.07.2010, 00:00:15
RE: DFD: 511 vs. 625, 373 vs. 349 - by Beowulf - 23.07.2010, 02:39:07
RE: DFD: 511 vs. 625, 373 vs. 349 - by MRMIdAS - 23.07.2010, 22:54:45
RE: DFD: 511 vs. 625, 373 vs. 349 - by Lt Albrecht - 25.07.2010, 14:09:46
RE: DFD: 511 vs. 625, 373 vs. 349 - by Renegade - 28.07.2010, 23:26:13
RE: DFD: 511 vs. 625, 373 vs. 349 - by Renegade - 06.08.2010, 05:12:34
RE: DFD: 511 vs. 625, 373 vs. 349 - by AlexB - 07.08.2010, 05:12:59
RE: DFD: 511 vs. 625, 373 vs. 349 - by Renegade - 07.08.2010, 06:35:56



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)