Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 1013 vs. 659, 841 vs. 410
#3
[0000659] Amphibious structures would be a cool feature, the only thing I can see causing problems is having a building half on water, half on land, how you'd work round this i'm not sure, possibly only allow complete land or water placement.

[0000410] gets my support, there's currently no time to react intelligently with a force shield, just click and pray.
[Image: MRMIdAS2k.jpg]
MRMIdAS: No longer allowed to criticise Westwood on PPM


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 1013 vs. 659, 841 vs. 410 - by Renegade - 22.07.2010, 20:27:54
RE: DFD: 1013 vs. 659, 841 vs. 410 - by Beowulf - 23.07.2010, 01:59:54
RE: DFD: 1013 vs. 659, 841 vs. 410 - by MRMIdAS - 23.07.2010, 23:07:48
RE: DFD: 1013 vs. 659, 841 vs. 410 - by Renegade - 28.07.2010, 23:21:50
RE: DFD: 1013 vs. 659, 841 vs. 410 - by Renegade - 29.07.2010, 01:48:00
RE: DFD: 1013 vs. 659, 841 vs. 410 - by AlexB - 29.07.2010, 03:14:33
RE: DFD: 1013 vs. 659, 841 vs. 410 - by Renegade - 29.07.2010, 06:06:46



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)