reaperrr
22.07.2010, 23:14:55
Fight 1:
No-brainer to me, kill #400, support #976.
#400 does sound somewhat interesting, but it also sounds like something that a) will take quite some time to implement and b) won't really be used by many mods.
#976 otoh is something I reeeeally missed in RA1 and TS already: Because of how the game counts ammo, the Orca Bomber "officially" only had two ammo points, whereas the Harpy had 12, and consequently took 6 times (!) as long to reload. Same for MiG vs. Yak in RA1. No matter what value you set the global ReloadRate to, you end up either with aircraft that fire many weak shots that take too long to reload, or aircraft with few strong shots that reload too fast (or in worst case, both).
This should have been implemented by Westwood long ago, and I'd really like to see it implemented now.
Compared to #400 it's much more simple and straighforward, probably much easier to implement and would most likely see more wide-spread usage.
Fight 2:
Kill #514. I can't rule out the possibility that i just lack the imagination to see its usefulness, but since I can't and believe it's too complicated and of too limited usefulness I want this to die.
Support #640, it may be a purely cosmetical thing and somewhat pointless, but i believe it's one of these 'pointless' features that would actually be used by quite many (including myself, I guess
).
No-brainer to me, kill #400, support #976.
#400 does sound somewhat interesting, but it also sounds like something that a) will take quite some time to implement and b) won't really be used by many mods.
#976 otoh is something I reeeeally missed in RA1 and TS already: Because of how the game counts ammo, the Orca Bomber "officially" only had two ammo points, whereas the Harpy had 12, and consequently took 6 times (!) as long to reload. Same for MiG vs. Yak in RA1. No matter what value you set the global ReloadRate to, you end up either with aircraft that fire many weak shots that take too long to reload, or aircraft with few strong shots that reload too fast (or in worst case, both).
This should have been implemented by Westwood long ago, and I'd really like to see it implemented now.
Compared to #400 it's much more simple and straighforward, probably much easier to implement and would most likely see more wide-spread usage.
Fight 2:
Kill #514. I can't rule out the possibility that i just lack the imagination to see its usefulness, but since I can't and believe it's too complicated and of too limited usefulness I want this to die.
Support #640, it may be a purely cosmetical thing and somewhat pointless, but i believe it's one of these 'pointless' features that would actually be used by quite many (including myself, I guess
).