Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212
#10
1) I support #1020, because I think that a unit requiring power is a bit strange. As long as you aren't making a future mod with robots flying around (which is not what I do, so I don't have that much robots and cyborgs, but trees in my mod) the opposite is an nice graphics effect. If it wasn't power, but something like a supply limit, it'd get my vote, but what does power limit? In my opinion, it just reduces the usefulness of the assigned unit, not more.

2) I support #212, because I think that lack the infiltration weapon is just a graphical issue, while an AI improvement is a nice thing to discuss about. Being able of adding defence buildings to critical structures in addition to some units sounds fantastic.


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by AlexB - 20.07.2010, 06:24:20
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by jimmy3421 - 20.07.2010, 06:43:03
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Blade - 20.07.2010, 15:34:17
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by MRMIdAS - 20.07.2010, 16:46:22
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Darkstorm - 20.07.2010, 20:07:38
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Blade - 20.07.2010, 23:19:33
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Beowulf - 21.07.2010, 07:54:52
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Darkstorm - 21.07.2010, 09:44:45
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Striker - 21.07.2010, 13:33:32
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Renegade - 23.07.2010, 02:11:07
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by AlexB - 07.08.2010, 19:18:45
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Renegade - 08.08.2010, 07:58:14



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)