Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212
#6
Fight 1

Issue 1: Personally, I'd like to see more reimplementation of features from old games, so this definitely gets my vote. While you can over do the fire damage (eh rm... TI), it is a neat feature to have when it finds balance. Plus, in RA2, when you pay attention, it looks odd when you shoot a tree with a flamethrower or even a cannon and it just disappears.

Issue 2: I see how this could be used to balance units but come on, there is a reason why mods remove the robot control center's limitation on robot tanks, or moves it to a structure not likely to be destroyed as easily. I foresee this being a nuisance, at best, to players. You build units to break free of base limitations, not to replicate them.

Support: [0001020] Re-Implementing TreeFires?
Kill: [0000347] Include a "Power=" tag on units.


Fight 2

Issue 1: Personally, this seems like a building parasite, just a one time damage dealing one. We already have restored spy effects, while it would be nice to see some more of those, I could care less for this effect. Just make a cloaked or disguised terrorist, that will replicate this effect enough.

Issue 2: AI Fire Bases, groups of defense buildings not those artillery emplacements of Zero Hour, seem as more worth in my opinion than a saboteur effect. The AI doesn't defend its important structures with anything that mere walls, and doesn't defend its tech structures at all.

Support: [0000212] Ai Building Firebases next to structures
Kill: [0000919] Custom infiltration-style weapons
[Image: darkstormsmall.png]


Messages In This Thread
DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by AlexB - 20.07.2010, 06:24:20
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by jimmy3421 - 20.07.2010, 06:43:03
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Blade - 20.07.2010, 15:34:17
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by MRMIdAS - 20.07.2010, 16:46:22
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Darkstorm - 20.07.2010, 20:07:38
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Blade - 20.07.2010, 23:19:33
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Beowulf - 21.07.2010, 07:54:52
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Darkstorm - 21.07.2010, 09:44:45
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Striker - 21.07.2010, 13:33:32
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Renegade - 23.07.2010, 02:11:07
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by AlexB - 07.08.2010, 19:18:45
RE: DFD: 1020 vs. 347, 919 vs. 212 - by Renegade - 08.08.2010, 07:58:14



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)