Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD-R4: 335 vs. 504, 1020 vs. 316
#5
Fight 1
Kill 335
This is a good feature. It should eventually make it into Ares. However...
Support 504
This is a more useful feature. As others have said- functionality usually takes precedence over eye candy- this is one particularly insignificant example of eye candy.

Fight 2
Kill 1020
I never particularly cared for forest fires. They're either too intrusive gameplay wise (lol grenade went off, there goes your entire platoon!) and the whole system was rather unrealistic. A high explosive is much more likely to simply blow a tree to pieces rather than lighting it on fire.

Support 316
With the death of 976- Aircraft specific reload times largely due to this suggestion, I support it. It's also much more useful than Aircraft specific reload times for reasons Renegade enumerated in his Kill-vote for 976- secondary weapons don't have to be tied into primary ammo count.
Star Strike Next Beta :V.7x -- (current version=V.6x Build 2)
Star Strike TC Forums
Star Strike Website


Messages In This Thread
DFD-R4: 335 vs. 504, 1020 vs. 316 - by Renegade - 03.10.2010, 21:38:57
RE: DFD-R4: 335 vs. 504, 1020 vs. 316 - by eva-251 - 04.10.2010, 07:01:18
RE: DFD-R4: 335 vs. 504, 1020 vs. 316 - by AlexB - 10.10.2010, 00:51:40



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)