Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429
#3
Fight 1:

#718
Kill this.

#349
Save this.

Reason: A proper air combat system such as this improves an entire type of unit, and can significantly expand gameplay. I feel sorry for #718 getting put up against one of the most supported issues, but neat possible crate combinations just isn't nearly as impactful as proper air.




Fight 2:

#429
Kill this.

#765
Support this.

Reason: I don't really mind doing stuff like the American Air Force HQ for SW country specialization. Having a weapon on a garrisonable building is a great thing that I would definitely use though. A garrisonable cannon, a bunker with auto turrets, there are quite good possibilities for this.


Messages In This Thread
DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by Renegade - 11.08.2010, 01:42:28
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by mt. - 11.08.2010, 03:46:48
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by Speeder - 11.08.2010, 19:18:43
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by eva-251 - 11.08.2010, 19:48:50
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by MRMIdAS - 11.08.2010, 19:58:33
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by Beowulf - 11.08.2010, 21:57:50
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by AlexB - 03.10.2010, 01:21:33
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by DCoder - 03.10.2010, 20:37:19



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)