Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429
#2
Fight 1:
#349 is more useful and far more popular.

Support #349
Kill #718



Fight 2:
Unless I misunderstand it, #429 basically requests something that is already possible through work-arounds. It would make things a bit more convenient for some modders, but it's not something the players of the mod would benefit from.

#765 is a different story, it would allow for buildings similiar to the SC2 bunker with weapon upgrade, and would be really nice in combination with the unhardcoded Urban Combat values.
Thus,

support #765
kill #429


Messages In This Thread
DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by Renegade - 11.08.2010, 01:42:28
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by reaperrr - 11.08.2010, 03:13:24
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by mt. - 11.08.2010, 03:46:48
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by Speeder - 11.08.2010, 19:18:43
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by eva-251 - 11.08.2010, 19:48:50
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by MRMIdAS - 11.08.2010, 19:58:33
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by Beowulf - 11.08.2010, 21:57:50
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by AlexB - 03.10.2010, 01:21:33
RE: DFD-R3: 349 vs. 718, 765 vs. 429 - by DCoder - 03.10.2010, 20:37:19



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)