Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DFD-R3: 715 vs. 725, 757 vs. 607
#9
Kill #725. Ever after reviewing the idea, I still dislike it. I like my two-click Chronospheres, thank you. As such, I wholeheartedly support #725. Lifting ridiculous limits on upgrades is a far sight more useful than a Chronoshift that only needs one click. I'd say use the generic unit spawn superweapon for that if you really want it.

Support #757. I'm keen on the idea of deploying changing statistics. It's a really nifty idea that would play out well for units that change forms. People could create units reminiscent of the Jet Tengu from RA3 or the Viking from SC2. I really like that over Storage on buildings. However, I do still like #607 for that classic-style projects.
I'm what Willis was talkin' about.


Messages In This Thread
DFD-R3: 715 vs. 725, 757 vs. 607 - by Renegade - 11.08.2010, 01:41:24
RE: DFD-R3: 715 vs. 725, 757 vs. 607 - by Orac - 11.08.2010, 05:41:22
RE: DFD-R3: 715 vs. 725, 757 vs. 607 - by Blade - 11.08.2010, 12:36:04
RE: DFD-R3: 715 vs. 725, 757 vs. 607 - by eva-251 - 11.08.2010, 19:02:44
RE: DFD-R3: 715 vs. 725, 757 vs. 607 - by MRMIdAS - 11.08.2010, 20:15:31
RE: DFD-R3: 715 vs. 725, 757 vs. 607 - by Beowulf - 11.08.2010, 22:19:07
RE: DFD-R3: 715 vs. 725, 757 vs. 607 - by AlexB - 18.09.2010, 17:38:45



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)